About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-183695 1 (1975-11-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcsz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                      q  VV
                             THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
 OECISI0rW            ~      OF   THE UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548




 FILE:       B-183695               DATE:November  14,1975

 MATTER OF:        Square Deal Trucking Co., Inc.


 DIGEST:

1.  Prior decision holding that since IFB contained defective
    award factors contract awarded should be canceled and award
    made to properly evaluated low bidder is affirmed on recon-
    sideration as GAO recognized in prior decision that although
    award would be based on award factors other than contained in
    IFB, such award would be consistent with mandate of 41 U.S.C.
    § 253(b) and competition was not adversely affected by defective
    award factors.

2.  Fact that bidder had performance bond under prior IFB which was
    canceled and readvertised provides no basis to waive failure of
    bidder to submit bond under resolicitation, which was separate
    and distinct procurement from canceled IFB.


    Capitol  Waste Systems (Capitol) has requested reconsideration
of our decision of October 2, 1975, on the protest of Square Deal
Trucking Co., Inc. (SDT), under solicitation No. BEP-75-151(A),
issued by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing, Department of the
Treasury (BEP).

     In that decision, we held that the solicitation contained
improper award factors which limited the evaluation of bids solely
to unit prices without regard to the total cost to the Government
for the entire contract period, thereby violating the provisions of
41 U.S.C. § 253(b), which requires award on the basis of the most
favorable cost to the Government. However, we found that as
competition was not adversely affected, award should be made to SDT,
whose bid offered the lowest actual cost to the Government for the
entire contract term. Finally, we held that, notwithstanding receipt
by Capitol of a letter from BEP accepting the bid of Capitol, no
contract came into existence because Capitol did not comply with the
condition contained in the letter, namely, the submission of a
performance bond.


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most