About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-181329 1 (1975-11-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcru0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                           . THE  COMPTRL.L.LER GENERAL
DECISION         -         . OF   THE UNITED         STATES
                             WASHINGTON. D. C. 20548



FILE:                              DATE:       V  261975

MATTN. P9
               Mary A. Miguel   Claim for retrOactive promotion
               after reemployment following break in service
DIGEST:
                 Where employee, who was interviewed for new
                 position on last day of LWOP, suffered 1l-day
                 break in service due to processing of appoint-
                 ment, employee may not have separation date
                 from prior position changed to avoid break in
                 service and thereby obtain pay adjustment
                 since she was not entitled to LWOP under
                 agency regulations and she could not use
                 annual leave when it was known she would
                 not return to duty at previous post.

              2.  Employee, who was interviewed for new position
                  on last day of LWOP, suffered 11-day break in
                  service. Lmployee claims additional pay
                  on ground she would have been appointed
                  at higher salary but for break in service
                  caused by misinformation by agency employee.
                  There is no entitleaent since record indi-
                  cates break in service resulted from normal
                  time required to process appointment, not.
                  misinformation.

              3.  Where employee suffered break in service
                  allegedly due to reliance upon isimnformation
                  from personnel officer regarding pay adjust-
                  meant and effect of break in service, saployce
                  has no legal basis for claim for additional
                  pay she would have received but for break
                  since United States is nwt liable for negli-
                  gent or erroncous acts of its agents.

              4. .Where employee suffered break in service
                  allegedly due to reliance upon riasiniormation
                  from persoeel officer regarding pay adjust-
                  ment and effect of break in service, employee
                  is not entitled under Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C.
                  a 5596, to additional pay she would have
                  received but for brcak. irmiployee fails to
                  meet two-pronged standard that action was
                  oun~d to be ipropr  or erroneous by appropriate
                  authority aad that such action resulted directly
                  in loss of pay.

               r7.'   7  (-C/L Q 7 ?(vi71,

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most