About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-182300 1 (1975-12-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcqx0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
FILE:    B-

MATTER   0


DIGEST:


182300                DATE:   DEC  4 1975     -7 (a
F:  Marshall S. Hellmann - Reconsideration of Claim
    for Severance Pay

1.  Former employee of U. S. Geological Survey,
    residing in Potomac, Maryland, who declined to
    accompany his activity when it moved from
    Washington, D. C.. to Reston, Virginia, was
    separated for such refusal. He is not entitled
    to severance pay under provisions of 5 U. S. C.
    S 5595, since U. S. Civil Service Commission has
    determined that Potomac, Maryland, is in the same
    commuting area as Reston, Virginia, and hence
    employee would not have been compelled to change
    his residence.


             2.  The refusal of an employee to accept an order of
                 reassignment within the same commuting area, made
                 in the best interests of the Government, constitutes
                 insubordination, and as such comes under the aen-
                 eral heading of misconduct. Under 5 U. S. C. § 5595,
                 an employee is not entitled to severance pay if sep-
                 arated for cause based on misconduct.

   This action is in response to a request by Mr. Marshall S. Hellmann,
a former employee of the United States Geological Survey, Department
of the Interior, for reconsideration of our decision in B-182300,
January 16, 1975, in which we sustained the action of our Transporta-
tion and Claims Division in disallowing Mr. Hellmann's claim for severance
pay.

   The facts and circumstances, as well as the law and regulations
pertinent to this claim, are contained in our prior decision and will
not be repeated here except where necessary. In his letters of
February 12 and March 14, 1975, Mr. Hellmann states that the meaning
of involuntary separation as it appears in subchapter S11-2f, Federal
Personnel Mvianual (FPM) Supplement 831-1, is for retirement annuity
purposes and is not germane to his claim for severance pay. He con-
tends that the definition of involuntary separation for retirement pay
purposes is more stringent than that for severance pay.





                QQYU 7~@  o


         THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
1     OF THE UNITED STATES
         WASHINGTON. D.C. 20546
         I VIT4

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most