About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-183549 1 (1975-07-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcqq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                 LV, THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL
 DECISION                  . OF   THE UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 2O548
                     tITIV


FILE:    B-183549                   DATE:   July 2, 1975

MATTER OF:         Mike Cooke Reforestation


DIGEST:

     Low bid which failed to acknowledge amendment to invita-
     tion for bids which made revision in method of payment
     was properly rejected as nonresponsive since amendment
     affected contract price and is, therefore, material and
     not subject to waiver. Furthermore, since agency states
     that copy of amendment was timely mailed to all bidders,
     protesting bidder's failure to receive and acknowledge
     amendment cannot be viewed as result of conscious and
     deliberate effort to exclude bidder from competition.



     On January 13, 1975, the United States Forest Service,
Deschutes National Forest, Bend,-Oregon, issued invitation for
bids (IFB) No. R6-1-75-26 for auger tree planting in various areas
within the Fort Rock Ranger District.

     Amendment No. 1 to the IFB was issued on February 4, 1975,
and deleted section 430, Method of Payment paragraph in the IFB
and substituted a new paragraph therein.

     Mike Cooke Reforestation (Cooke) was the low bidder under the
IFB but its bid was rejected for failure to acknowledge and return
the above amendment. Cooke protested this rejection to the con-
tracting officef contending that (1) it had not received the amend-
ment, and (2) that the amendment did not materially affect the IFB.
Following a denial of the protest by the contracting officer, the
matter was presented to our Office for decision.

     Addressing first the failure of Cooke to receive the amendment,
generally, if a bidder does not receive and acknowledge a material
amendment to an IFB and such failure is not the result of a con-
scious and deliberate effort to exclude the bidder from participating
in the competition, the bid must be rejected as nonresponsive.
40 Comp. Gen. 126, 128 (1960). In its report regarding the protest,
the contracting officer states that the amendment was .mailed to all


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most