About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-181698,B-181706 1 (1975-02-06)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcfq0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                             THE  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION         .           OF   THE UNITEO STATEs
                          -  WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548




FILE:  B-181698 k                   DATE:  February 6, 1975
       B-181706
MATTER OF:          Tombs & Sons, Inc.
                    Dyneteria, Inc.

DIGEST:

1.   Contracting officer properly rejected low offer for Navy
     mess attendant services where RFP required justification
     if offeror proposed manning levels lower than Government
     estimate and offeror guaranteed to meet the contract's
     requirements at no increase in price, since if performance
     is required at Government estimate offeror's price does
     not support its basic labor costs as required by RFP.

2.   No basis exists to question award for mess attendant
     services to offeror which proposed manning levels lower
     than Government estimate, where offeror properly sub-
     stantiated deficiency, as permitted by RFP, and offeror's
     proposal met other requirements of RFP (i.e. dollar/hour
     ratio comparison with basic labor cost) without regard to
     prices submitted for volume variation factor.


     On May 30, 1974, request for proposals (RFP) N66314-74-R-2570,
for the performance of mess attendant services from July 1, 1974,
through June 30, 1975, at the Naval Station, Treasure Island, San
Francisco, was issued by the Naval Regional Procurement Office,
Naval Supply Center, Oakland, California. Twelve of the 13 firms
responding by the June 14, 1974, deadline for receipt of offers
were determined to be in the competitive range.

     On June 19, 1974, those 12 offerors were contacted by tele-
phone and advised that the best and final offers were to be sub-
mitted by June 21, 1974. Moreover, the agency states that all
offerors were then advised that the submission of an unbalanced
offer with respect to the volume variation factor (§ E of the
RFP) would cause the offer to be rejected. The contracting
officer confirmed these oral. instructions by telegram dated
June 20, 1974, and timely best and final offers were received from
all of the offerors.


- 1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most