About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-181028 1 (1974-07-11)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcde0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



DECISION


FILE: B-181028


        THE   COMPTROLLER GENERAL
        OF THE UNITED STATES
1\4.--  '. WASHINGTON.  O.C. 20548


DATE:   July 11, 1974


MATTER OF: Fritz A. Nachant, Inc.
              Invitation for Bids No. N62474-74-B-2965


DIGEST:


Contracting officer was not on actual or
constructive notice of mistake in bid of
low bidder nor was there any duty to seek
bid verification where all six bids fol-
lowed a normal upward progression and four
bids were priced below the Government's
estimate.


     This matter involves a mistake alleged by Fritz A. Nachant,
Inc. (Nachant) in its bid under the subject invitation covering
the construction of a maintenance building at the Naval Air
Station, North Island, San Diego, California.

     The requirement was the subject of two solicitations, the
first having been canceled because of a mistake in the low bid
and the excessive pricesof the remaining bids. The readvertised
IFB, with some specification changes, was opened March 15, 1974,
and award was made on that date to Nachant, the lowest aggregate
bidder.

     In a telegram dated April 5, 1974, Nachant advised the Navy
that its bid was $30,000 to $40,000 lower than it should have
been.  The telegram alleged that a mistake was caused by a faulty
subcontractor quotation. The contractor has requested relief by
way of rescission of the contract. Nachant has suggested that
the Government knew or should have known of the mistake before
the bid was accepted for award.

     As a general rule, when a bid has been accepted the bidder
is bound to perform and must bear the consequences of its
unilateral mistake.  Saligman et al. v. United States, 56 F. Supp.
505 (D.C.E.D. PA. 1944). However, our Office has held that no
valid and binding contract is consummated where the contracting
officer knew or should have known of the probability of error,
but neglected to take proper steps to verify the bid. 37 Comp.
Gen. 685 (1958) and 17 Comp. Gen. 575 (1938). In determining
whether a contracting officer has a duty to verify bid prices
we have stated:


- 1 -


? -5- .2 51

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most