About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-180811 1 (1974-07-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcch0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                                  T7HE  cCrA=TROLLEr1 MENIERAL
                         .I  1  ....  O  THEU UNITEM STATES
                                  V. AS  -N  GTON      - . C . 2O 5 3 L




     FILE:                               DATE:         JUL  291974

     MATTER OF:
                    Reiabureme of brokerae and attorney fees in        ) L   s   so
                    ale  of residence by transferred employee

               1.  Where an emploves entered into a contract for the
                   purchase of a residence at his old duty station, but
                   did not occunv the residence because at a transter,
                   he may be reimbursed the costs of selline the resi-
                   dence since he was prevnted  from occupying the resi-
                   dence, as reouired by the Federal Travel Regulations,
                   by the act of the Government.

               2.  Where an employee claimed rainbursemnt  for a lump-
                   sum attorney fee incident to the sale of his resi-
                   dence in connection witn transter, payment may not
                   be made until he suirdts an itemized state.mewnt aince
                   only those legal fees may be paid which are listed
                   in section 2-6.2e, FPM{R 101-7, and the lump-sum fee
                   may include unallowable items.

     An Authorized Certifying Officer, Department of Justice, has requested
a decision in a letter dated March 5, 1974, as to whether a transferred
employee may be reimbursed for the expenses of selling a residence under
the circumstances described below.

     Mr. Jay horowitz, an Assistant United States Attorney for the
Southern District of New York, lived in an apartment in Brooklyn with
his wife and children.  In May 1973 he contracted to purchase a residence
in New Rochelle, New York, depositing $7,500, 10 percent of the purchase
price, in accordance with the usual practice. Closing was set for
Au-,,ust 1. 1973, and Xr. L:orowitz arranreu to terminate his c-3artmnt lease
in August as well.  After entering into the purchase contract, Mr. Horowits
accepted a transfer to the Watergate Special Prosecution Force in
Washington, D. C.  He began his work in Washington as scheduled on
August 19, 1973.  On or about August 10, Mr. Horowitz and his family, at
the conclusion of the lease, left the apartment in Brooklyn. Rather than
moving his furniture to the house in New Rochelle and a second time to
the Washington area, Mr. Horowitz chose to put it in storame.
Mrs. Horowitz and the children stayed temporarily with her parents in
New Jersey.  Mr. Horowitz stayed in hotels in Washington and traveled to





                                                           PUBLISHED DECISION
                                                           54 Comp. Gen..........
      A                          O       R4p

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most