About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-180128 1 (1974-01-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadcbr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: DECISION FILE: B-180128 plLER t4 THE COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548 DATE: January 29, 1974 MATTER OF: 14 & 7 Metals, Inc. DIGEST: Purchaser whose bid price of $0.4625 per pound on scrap metal was substantially higher than next high bid of $0.2621 per pound and current market appraisal of $0.32 per pound may have sales contract rescinded, since in view of substantial difference between pur- chaser's bid and next high bid and current market appraisal and fact that prices on scrap metal do not vary greatly, contracting officer should have been on notice of possibility of error in bid and should have requested verification before acceptance. By sales invitation No. 31-4015, issued by the Defense Property Disposal Region Office, Defense Supply Agency, Memphis, Tennessee, bids were requested for the purchase from the Government of various types of scrap metal. In response, M & M Metals, Inc. (M & M), sub- mitted a bid offering to purcaase, among other items, the scrap metal described under item 14 at a price of $C.4625 per pound. On Septem- ber 6, 1973, contract No. 31-4015-097 was awarded to M & M for item 14. M & M alleges that a mistake was made in its bid in that it inadvertently placed the bid price intended for item 13 opposite item 14. The corporation has requested that the contract be canceled without liability to the firm., The seven other bids on item 14 ranged from $0.2621 to $0.020998 per pound. The current market appraisal value, known to the contracting officer prior to bid opening, was $0.32 per pound. In that connection, counsel for the Defense Property Disposal Service exoresses the opinion that the contracting officer should have requested verification of the M & M bid. The basis of the oninion is that the property offered for sale under item 14 consisted of scrap metal; that it isagenerally accepted fact that bids on scrap metal do not vary as greatly as do bids on usable surplus property; and that there is a substantial disparity between the corporation's bid on item 14 and the next high bid and the current market appraisal of that item. We agree that the contracting officer was on constructive notice of error and that the bid should have been verified prior to award. Seelp49 Comp. Gen. 199, 202 (1969), and B-17h900, March 7, 1972. 0-977 -1 -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most