About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-216952 1 (1985-10-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbyj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   LIL    UNRESTRICTE  - O
                         TH  COMPTROLLER GENERAL
DECISION                 OP  THE   UNITED STATES
                         WASHINGTON. D.C. 2O549



FILE:     B-216952             DATE: October 18, 1985

MATTER   OF:     Carl L. Haggins - Overtime Compensation -
                 Retroactive Quality Step Increase

DIGEST:

          1.  Former employee of Department of
              the Interior alleges that he
              performed overtime work as an Equal
              .Employment Opportunity (EEO)
              Investigator because of heavy work-
              load and remoteness of worksites,
              and that the discretionary perform-
              ance of overtime work was recognized
              by the agency. Interior had a
              written policy which stated that
              overtime work must be approved in
              advance by the Chief of the EEO
              Complaints Investigations Branch and
              that overtime could not be claimed
              unless approved in advance.
              Claimant has been paid for overtime
              work that was approved in advance.
              Since other overtime work allegedly
              performed by claimant was not
              ordered or approved by the Branch
              Chief, overtime compensation for
              that work may not be paid. See
              5 U.S.C. S 5542 (1982); Baylor v.
              United States, 198 Ct. Cl. 331
              (1972).

          2.  Former employee of Department of
              the Interior claims entitlement to a
              quality step increase (QSI). His
              supervisor recommended that he be
              granted a QSI but, upon review, the
              award was not approved since
              performance standards had not been
              established for the employee's unit
              at that time. Claimant is not
              entitled to a QSI inasmuch as agency
              has discretionary authority, under
              5 U.S.C. S 5336 (1982), to approve
              or disapprove a QSI. Claimant does

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most