About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-404267,B-404267.2 1 (2011-01-25)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbru0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                  Comptroller General
       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office     DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                   The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                       GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                       approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter  of:  Applied Technology Systems, Inc.

          File:        B-404267, B-404267.2

          Date:        January 25, 2011

          Adam  J. Smith, Esq., and Hilary S. Cairnie, Esq., Baker & Hostetler, LLP, for the
          protester.
          S. Lane Tucker, Esq., and John R. Evans, Esq., Stoel Rives, LLP, for Alutiiq Education
          and Training, LLC, the intervenor.
          Peter J. Dickson, Esq., Department of Labor, for the agency.
          Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Sharon L. Larkin, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Protest that agency was required to assign the maximum possible ratings to
          protester's proposal under evaluation factors where protester's proposal contained
          evaluated strengths and no evaluated weaknesses fails to state a valid basis for
          protest.

          2. Protester's assertions that various portions of its proposal that were rated as
          satisfactory or very good should have received higher ratings reflects protester's
          mere disagreement with the agency's various judgments, and provides no basis for
          sustaining the protest.

          3. Agency reasonably evaluated protester's proposal as reflecting multiple
          weaknesses, including the conclusion that protester's proposal provided limited
          information regarding multiple instances of negative past performance and little
          insight into how protester intended to improve its prior performance.

          4. Where agency led protester into the area of its proposal that required additional
          information, protester's failure to fully respond to agency's question does not create
          a requirement for the agency to re-open discussions.
          DECISION

          Applied Technology Systems, Inc. (ATSI), of Cleveland, Ohio, protests the
          Department  of Labor's award of a contract to Alutiiq Education and Training, LLC,
          pursuant to request for proposals (RFP) No. DOLJO9RFP00002 for operation of the

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most