About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-403012.2,B-403012.3 1 (2010-10-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbod0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                  Comptroller General
       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office     DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                   The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                       GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                       approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter  of:  Ferris Optical

          File:        B-403012.2; B-403012.3

          Date:        October 21, 2010

          DECISION

          Ferris Optical of Chatworth, California protests the issuance of a purchase order to
          db Hadley & Associates LLC (Hadley) of Venice, Florida, under request for
          quotations (RFQ) No. VA-262-10-RQ-0107, issued by the Department of Veterans
          Affairs (VA) for eyeglass services. The protester argues that Hadley is ineligible for
          award because  Hadley lacks the required experience, cannot satisfy the RFQ
          limitation on subcontracting requirement, does not qualify as a nonmanufacturer of
          eyeglasses, and its offered price was unreasonably low. Additionally, the protester
          challenges the agency's evaluation of its quotation.

          Subsequent to the filing of this protest, on September 24, 2010, the Small Business
          Administration (SBA) issued a decision that Hadley was not a small business
          concern and thus was ineligible for award under this solicitation. As a result of the
          SBA's decision, the VA decided to terminate for convenience the award to Hadley.
          Corrective Action Letter, Oct. 8, 2010. The VA states that, since there were no other
          technically acceptable quotations, it decided to cancel the solicitation. Id.
          Specifically, with regard to Ferris' quotation, the agency states that the quotation
          was unacceptable because the firms' opticians were not licensed. Agency Report
          at 7-8.

          We  dismiss the protests because the agency is terminating the awardee's contract
          and canceling the solicitation.

          The jurisdiction of our Office is established by the bid protest provisions of the
          Competition in Contracting Act of 1984, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3551-3556 (2000 & Supp. IV
          2004). Our role in resolving bid protests is to ensure that the statutory requirements
          for full and open competition are met. Pacific Photocopy and Research Servs.,
          B-278698, B-278698.3, Mar. 4, 1998, 98-1 CPD ¶ 69 at 4.

          When  an agency terminates an awardee's contract and cancels the solicitation, the
          agency action renders a protest of that award academic. We do not consider

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most