About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-402613.2,B-402613.3 1 (2010-07-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbjv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   Ii
   .L

 A       GA        O                                                 Comptroller General
f. A    Accountabity * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
  United States Government Accountability Office
  Washington, DC 20548



          Decision


          Matter  of:  Special Services

          File:        B-402613.2; B-402613.3

          Date:        July 21, 2010

          Adrian H. Garcia for the protester.
          Antonio T. Robinson, Esq., Department of Agriculture, for the agency.
          Pedro E. Briones, Esq., and Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest is denied where award was made consistent with the terms of the solicitation
          and the agency's mathematical error in calculating vendors' overall point scores did
          not result in competitive prejudice to the protester.
          DECISION

          Special Services, of Los Angeles, California, protests the award of a contract to AG
          Forest Services, Inc., of Cambria, California, under request for quotations (RFQ) No.
          AG-0267-S-10-0001 issued by the Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service, for
          national visitor use monitoring at Sawtooth National Forest, Idaho.

          We  deny the protest.

          BACKGROUND

          The RFQ,  issued as a commercial item acquisition set-aside for small businesses,
          sought quotations for surveys of visitor satisfaction and recreational usage to be
          conducted between  May 10, 2010, and September 30, 2010, at Sawtooth National
          Forest. RFQ, Statement of Work (SOW), at 19. Vendors were informed that award
          would  be made to the vendor whose quotation was found to be most advantageous
          to the government, price and other factors considered. The RFQ identified the
          following technical evaluation factors and their relative weights: past performance
          (50%), technical approach (40%), and experience of key personnel (10%). The
          technical factors were stated to be, when combined, approximately equal in weight
          to price. Id. at 32-33. With respect to price, vendors were to submit a single total
          price for conducting the surveys. Id. at 18.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most