About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-401868.2 1 (2009-12-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadbch0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


  AlL

A     ,   GA       O                                                  Comptroller General
       Accuntabiity * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
 United States Government Accountability Office
 Washington, DC 20548

             D   ..
          Decision


          Matter of:  Gas Turbine Engines, Inc.

          File:       B-401868.2

          Date:       December  14, 2009

          Ginger Denos for the protester.
          Debra J. Talley, Esq., and Christopher C. Schwan, Esq., U.S. Army Materiel
          Command,  for the agency.
          Christina Sklarew, Esq., and Guy R. Pietrovito, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          In a negotiated procurement where award was to be made on the basis of low price,
          agency did not conduct meaningful discussions where the agency sent identical
          letters to protester and other competitive-range offerors that did not inform
          protester that the agency viewed its proposed price to be unreasonably high;
          nonetheless, protest is denied where the record does not establish a reasonable
          possibility that the protester was prejudiced by the lack of meaningful discussions.
          DECISION

          Gas Turbine Engines, Inc. (GTE) protests the award of a contract to Prototype
          Engineering & Mfg., Inc., under request for proposals (RFP) No. W58RGZ-08-R-0825,
          issued by the U.S. Army Materiel Command for maintenance and overhaul of Flutter
          Dampener  Assemblies that are used on the UH-60 Helicopter. GTE complains that
          the Army conducted inadequate and misleading discussions.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP provided for the award of a 5-year indefinite-delivery, indefinite quantity
          contract to the responsive and responsible offeror whose proposal was evaluated at
          the lowest total cost to the government; there were no technical evaluation factors
          identified in the solicitation. The Army received offers from 11 vendors, which
          ranged in price from $8.25 million to $55.8 million. Prototype Engineering's initial
          price proposal was $9,396,020, and GTE's initial proposal price was $31,750,800. The
          proposals of all 11 offerors were included in the competitive range, although the
          Army's pre-negotiation objective was $8,245,643.25. See Agency Report (AR),

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most