About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-401023 1 (2009-04-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadaur0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   li
   AL

A     ,   GA       O                                                   Comptroller General
        Accuntabiity * Integrity * Reliability                          of the United States
 United States Government Accountability Office
 Washington, DC 20548

              D  ..
          Decision


          Matter  of:  Precision Prosthetics, Inc.

          File:        B-401023

          Date:        April 9, 2009

          John K. Lee for the protester.
          Donald C. Mobly, Esq., Department of Veterans Affairs, for the agency.
          Susan K. McAuliffe, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General
          Counsel, GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Protest challenging agency's evaluation of protester's proposal is denied where the
          record establishes that the evaluation was reasonable and consistent with the
          solicitation's evaluation criteria.
          DECISION

          Precision Prosthetics, Inc. (PPI), of El Paso, Texas, protests the evaluation of its
          proposal under request for proposals (RFP) No. VA-258-08-RP-0066, issued by the
          Department  of Veterans Affairs (VA) for the fabrication and repair of artificial limbs
          for VA patients in El Paso, Texas and Las Cruces, New Mexico.

          We deny the protest.

          The RFP, set aside for small business concerns, contemplated the award of multiple
          fixed-price, indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contracts for a base period and
          4 option years. Awards were to be made to those offerors whose proposals were
          deemed  most advantageous to the agency considering technical and price factors.
          The RFP  set out four equally weighted evaluation factors for award, including the
          following three technical evaluation factors: 1) management and experience;
          2) quality and past performance, including evaluation of a synopsis to be included in
          the proposal explaining the offeror's overall approach to quality control and quality
          improvement; the offeror's proposed quality improvement plan; and past
          performance information; and 3) technical certification. Price, the fourth factor, was
          to be evaluated in terms of the amount of the firm's offered yearly discount,
          calculated as a percentage reduction to published price lists for orthotic and
          prosthetic devices referenced in the solicitation. RFP at 7, 33-34. Offerors were

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most