About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-400706 1 (2009-01-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadasb0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


JiL
AL

         G    A   O                                                  Comptroller General
      Acc untabiity * Integrity * Reliability of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office
Washington, DC 20548

            D   ..
         Decision


         Matter of:  Granite Construction Company

         File:       B-400706

         Date:       January 14, 2009

         Brian Dowd for the protester.
         James H. Roberts III, Esq., and Carrol H. Kinsey Jr., Esq., Van Scoyoc Kelly PLLC, for
         Baldi Brothers, Inc., the intervenor.
         Bryan C. Naquin, Esq., and Paul Clay, Esq., Department of the Navy, Naval Facilities
         Engineering Command,  for the agency.
         Paula A. Williams, Esq., and Ralph 0. White, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
         GAO, participated in the preparation of the decision.
         DIGEST

         Protest challenging evaluation of protester's technical proposal as unacceptable is
         denied where record demonstrates agency reasonably concluded that protester's
         offered small business subcontracting plan did not meet the solicitation's
         subcontracting requirements or provide sufficient rationale supporting its lower
         goals; protester's arguments amount to mere disagreement with agency's
         conclusions.
         DECISION

         Granite Construction Company (Granite) of Sacramento, California, protests the
         award of a contract to Baldi Brothers, Inc., of Beaumont, California, under request
         for proposals (RFP) No. N62473-08-R-2206, issued by the Department of the Navy,
         Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC)  for runway repairs at Travis Air
         Force Base (AFB) in California. The protester argues that the agency improperly
         evaluated its proposal as technically unacceptable.


         1 The protester was not represented by counsel and, therefore, did not have access to
         nonpublic information pursuant to the terms of a protective order. Accordingly, our
         discussion in this decision is necessarily general in nature to avoid reference to
         nonpublic information. Our conclusions, however, are based on our review of the
         entire record, including nonpublic information.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most