About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-310566.4 1 (2008-10-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobadaqf0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




          G    A     0                                                  Comptroller General
       Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                         of the United States
United States Government Accountability Office     DOCUMENT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE
Washington, DC 20548                                   The decision issued on the date below was subject to a
                                                       GAO Protective Order. This redacted version has been
                                                       approved for public release.

          Decision

          Matter  of:  Triple Canopy, Inc.

          File:        B-310566.4

          Date:        October 30, 2008

          Kelley P. Doran, Esq., G. Matthew Koehl, Esq., Sean P. Bamford, Esq., Victor G.
          Vogel, Esq., and Michael F. Scanlon, Esq., K&L Gates LLP, for the protester.
          Timothy B. Mills, Esq., Maggs & McDermott LLC, for Sabre International Security,
          an intervenor.
          Maj. William J. Nelson, Department of the Army, for the agency.
          Glenn G. Wolcott, Esq., and Ralph 0. White, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          1. Pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act of 2008, which authorizes
          protests of task orders valued in excess of $10 million, this Office's consideration of
          such protests will include an assessment of whether a procuring agency's source
          selection decision was reasonably consistent with the terms of the underlying
          solicitation and applicable procurement laws and regulations.

          2. Where, prior to the submission of proposals, the agency expressly advised
          offerors that it would not require contractors to obtain facilities security clearances
          to perform task order requirements, protest that awardee was ineligible for task
          order award on the basis that it does not hold a facilities clearance is essentially an
          untimely challenge to the terms of the solicitation.

          3. Protest that agency failed to reasonably evaluate the past performance of
          protester and awardee is denied where agency's past performance evaluation record
          is consistent with solicitation's definition of relevant past performance, contains
          adequate contemporaneous   documentation supporting the agency's assessments,
          and the opinions of protester's personnel regarding the awardee's prior performance
          provide no credible basis to question the reasonableness of the agency's
          assessments.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most