About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-290998 1 (2002-10-30)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacybi0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


   I

          G    A     0Comptroller General
A-      Accountability * Integrity * Reliability                     of the United States
United States General Accounting Office
Washington, DC 20548




          Decision

          Matter  of: Forest Regeneration Services LLC

          File:       B-290998

          Date:       October 30, 2002

          Barry S. Rose and Linda L. Rose for the protester.
          Lynn W. Flanagan, Esq., and Daniel N. Hylton, Esq., Department of Agriculture, for
          the agency.
          Louis A. Chiarella, Esq., and Christine S. Melody, Esq., Office of the General Counsel,
          GAO,  participated in the preparation of the decision.
          DIGEST

          Challenge to agency's evaluation of protester's proposal is denied where the record
          shows that the agency reasonably evaluated the proposal in accordance with the
          solicitation's evaluation factors.
          DECISION

          Forest Regeneration Services LLC (FRS) protests the award of a contract to Turner
          Enterprises under request for proposals (RFP) No. NEAT-02-096, issued by the
          Forest Service, Department of Agriculture, for herbicide spraying services within the
          Allegheny National Forest, Pennsylvania. FRS alleges that the evaluation of its
          technical proposal was unreasonable.

          We  deny the protest.

          The RFP, issued on May 8, 2002, contemplated the award of a fixed-price, incentive-
          fee contract for a base year and two 1-year options for the spraying of herbicides on
          understory vegetation in designated areas of the Allegheny National Forest. The
          solicitation established five technical evaluation factors in descending order of
          importance: technical approach, past performance, key personnel qualifications and
          experience, offeror's support equipment and facilities, and offeror's organization,
          qualifications and experience. The RFP also notified offerors that price was an
          important factor. The solicitation stated that the Forest Service intended to make
          award, without discussions, to the offeror whose proposal was technically
          acceptable and whose technical/price relationship was most advantageous to the
          government.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most