About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

122868 1 (1983-11-04)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacxvw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                          REGIONAL OFFICE
                              RooM 85
                     PATRICK V. MeNAMARA 3DM.RAL BUILDING
                           477 MICie4.-.! AVENUE
                        DETOwIT, MICMIoAN 48226


                                           NOVEMBER  4, 1983

The Honorable James  J. Blanchard
Governor of Michigan
State Capitol
Lansing, Michigan   48909
                                                  122868
Dear Governor Blanchard:

     Subject:  Michigan's  Early Implementation of the Small
               Cities  Community Development Block Grant Program

     Enclosed  is our final report which describes Michigan's
decisionmaking  process in implementing the Small Cities Community
Development Block Grant  Program as authorized by the Omnibus
Budget Reconciliation  Act of 1981.  It also provides a comparison
of 1982 State-funded  activities and populations targeted with
those of the Department  of Housing and Urban Development  (HUD) in
1981 and provides  local communities' and others' perceptions of
the success of Michigan's  program.  Michigan was one of seven
States we visited  to provide the Congress with up-to-date  infor-
mation on States'  progress in implementing their Small Cities
Program.  We previously  sent you a copy of our overall report  to
the Congress, States  Are Making Good Progress in Implementing
the Small Cities Community  Development Block Grant Program
(GAO/RCED-83-186,  Sept. 8, 1983), which incorporated the results
of our work  in seven States.  The enclosed report details  the
results of our  review in Michigan.

     Essentially,  we found that HUD, in fiscal year 1981,  and
Michigan, in  fiscal year 1982 (excluding HUD multiyear commit-
ments), each  spent about $21 million to fund Small Cities Program
projects.  However,  Michigan's program reflected priorities  that
were different  from HUD's.  Although they both funded the  same
types of projects,  HUD's program emphasized housing and public
works projects.   Michigan's program emphasized economic develop-
ment.  As a  result, housing and public works projects under
Michigan's  program decreased, and economic development projects
increased.  Michigaa  spent about 65 percent ($13.4 million)  of
its funds on economic  development projects or public works
projects  that had economic development as a goal, and about  31
percent (about  $6.4 million) on housing rehabilitation.   In 1981,
HUD spent about  38 percent ($8.2 million) of its Michigan

                                                          (384807)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most