About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

093052 1 (1970-10-19)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacwyg0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                      UNITED  STATES GENERAL  ACCOUNTING  OFFICE
                                WASHINGTON,  D.C. 20548


CIVIL DIVISION                                             OCT  191970


                                                           111111111111111II(I I 11 11(11 11 111 I111i11111111
                                                                 LM093052
        Dear Mr. Jackson:

             The General Accounting  Office has examined into the administration
        of the Workable Program  for Community Improvement (workable program)  by
        the Department of  Housing and Urban Development (HUD).  Our review was
        made pursuant  to the Budget and Accounting Act, 1921 (31 U.S.C. 53),
        and the Housing Act  of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 1435).

             This review was  performed concurrently with our review-and  report
        to the Congress on Opportunity  to Improve Allocation of Program  Funds
        to Better Meet the National  Housing-Goal (B-118754, dated October  2,
        1970).  The matters  discussed in this letter report are primarily
        administrative  in nature and were not included in our report  to the
        Congress.

             The objective  of our review was to determine the extent  to which
        HUD used the workable  program requirement to encourage cities  to
        identify and attempt  to alleviate their problems of blight and deteri-
        oration on a continuing  basis.  Our review included workable programs
        of five cities  located in three HUD regions.  Four cities--Detroit,
        Michigan; Atlanta,  Georgia; Wichita, Kansas; Tulsa, Oklahoma--were
        selected on  the basis of having significant amounts of HUD financial
        assistance.  The  fifth city--Omaha, Nebraska--was selected on  the
        basis of very  limited HUD financial assistance to determine  the con-
        sistency of HUD's  administration of workable programs.

             During our  review, we examined applicable Federal statutes,  HUD
 -      regulations, HUD  and city policies and practices, pertinent  files, and
        interviewed  local, regional, and departmental personnel.  Our work was
        performed at  the HUD Central Office in Washington, D.C.; at HUD  Regional
        Offices in Atlanta,  Georgia; Chicago, Illinois; and Fort Worth,  Texas;
        and at the  five selected cities within the'administrative jurisdiction
        of these three  offices.

             The need  for assurance that HUD's administration of workable  pro-
        grams provide  meaningful analyses of cities' self-help programs was
        the subject  of a previous report to the Congress on Review of  Selected
        Phases of Workable  Programs for Community Improvement Under  the Adminis-
        tration of  the Fort Worth Regional Office, Housing and Home Finance
        Agency  (B-118754, dated December 17, 1962).  In that report we  suggested

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most