About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

092673 1 (1969-12-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacwnn0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 




                      UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING  OFFICE
                               WASHINGTON,  D.C. 20548


CIVIL DIVISION


                                                           December 23, 1969



    Dear Mr. Spangler:

         This letter is to inform you that we have completed our review of the
    policies and procedures of the Federal Supply Service pertaining to the
    procurement of security file cabinets for the Federal Government.  Our re-
    view considered mainly the feasibility of competitive award alternatives
    to the negotiated, indefinite quantity, multiple-award Federal Supply
    Schedule contracts that have been used by FSS for the procurement of cabinets.

         For several years, FSS procurement officials and internal auditors
    have been concerned with the reasonableness of cabinet prices.  Efforts to
    obtain more favorable prices have been hampered because (1) cabinets are
    manufactured for the exclusive use of Federal agencies and their contrac-
    tors, (2) the number of suppliers qualified to produce cabinets for the
    Government has been somewhat limited, and (3) FSS is concerned with main-
    taining a continuing supply of qualified cabinet products.

         In discussions with FSS procurement representatives, we have suggested
    that FSS attempt to obtain more favorable prices for cabinets available
    from more than one supplier, by seeking to make use of a competitive system
    of contracting.  FSS has attempted to foster such competition by periodical-
    ly reducing the maximum order limitation in the Schedule and thereby in-
    creasing the number of definite quantity contracts.  We believe that there
    are additional opportunities for GSA to increase its purchases under competi-
    tive procedures.

         For example, in 1967, FSS adopted a zonal basis of contracting for
    cabinets but also continued to contract on a multiple-award basis.  In our
    opinion, the award of competitive contracts on a zonal basis could serve
    both to reduce prices and to alleviate the concern for maintaining a continu-
    ing supply of qualified products.  Competitive zonal contracting would offer
    existing suppliers several opportunities to obtain contracts, and at the same
    time, might attract additional firms to compete for the Government's cabinet
    requirements.

         Even with a concerted effort to maximize the use of competitive contract-
    ing for cabinets, negotiated contracts are necessary for those cabinet models

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most