About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-196981 1 (1981-01-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacuto0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 








GAO/576
United States General Accounting Office                      Office of
Washington, DC 20548                                         General Counsel
                                                             In Reply
                                                             Refer to: B-196981
                                                                   January 16, 1981



     The Honorable Mary Eastwood
     Acting Special Counsel
     Office of the Special Counsel
     1717 H Street, NW.
     Washington, D.C.   20414

     Dear Ms. Eastwood:

          As you know, the Office of Special Counsel has  requested our
     opinion on whether it has its own procurement authority  that it can
     exercise without clearance or approval from  the Merit Systems
     Protection Board (1iSPB).

         _This question had been under active consideration  by our Office
     for some time.  However, before we were able  to c6mplete our analysis
     and reach a final decision, we learned  that on November 21, 1980,1 a
     suit was filed in the United States District  Court for the District
     of Columbia by the MSPB against you  individually and in your official
     capacity as Acting Special Counsel-.  In essence, the complaint alleges
     that although the Chairwoman of  the MSPB is by statute MSPB's chief
     administrative and budgetary officer with  responsibility for its
     fiscal administration, you, as  Special Counsel -- the head of a sub-
     unit of the MSPB -- have refused  to comply with the Chairwoman's
     directives, asserting that you have  independent administrative and
     budgetary authority,

          Since procurement authority  is obviously part of the general
     administrative authority with which  the lawsuit is involved, it
     would appear that any substantive  judicialdisposition of the lawsuit
     would necessarily resolve your  question to us.  It is the consistent
     Position of ourlOffice not  to express our views with respect to
     matters which are currently  the subject of pending litigation.  See
     Sovereign Construction  Company, LTD; City of Philadelphia, B-185874,
     March 8, 1977,  77-1 CPD 168; Union Carbide Corporation, 56 Comp.
     Gen. 487  (1977), 77-1 CPD 243; Nartron Corporation, 53 Comp. Gen. 730
     (1974), 74-1 CPD  154; Lametti & Sons, Inc., 55 Comp. Gen. 413 (1975),
     75-2 CPD 265; Cubic Western  Data, Inc., B-189578, October 7, 1977,
     77-2 CPD 279; and  other cases cited in these decisions.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most