About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-199872 1 (1980-08-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacuro0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                                                                                PTL M-



                      UNITED STATES GENERAL  ACCOUNTING OFFICE                     i
                               WASHINGTON,  D.C. 20548

                                                         IN REPLY
OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL                                REFER To: B-199872
                                                                August 29, 1980


        The Honorable Alice Daniel           ^jc
        Assistant Attorney General
        Civil Division             *
        Department of Justice

             Attention:  Pollie Harris McElroy, Esq.
                         Commercial Litigation Branch

        Dear Ms. Daniel:

             Subject: [ancy  Lee Presson v. United States
                       Ct. Cl. No. 388-80 C
                       File Reference:  AD:DE:PHMcELROY:cl, 154-388-80 C

             Petitioner alleges that she was unlawfully separated from the
        United States Army on or about May 19, 1975, for alleged schizo-
        phrenia, the symptoms of which were willfully, maliciously, and
        intentionally induced conspiratorially by the individual District
        Court defendants.  She seeks disability compensation for physical
        and mental bodily injuries and pain and suffering sustained while
        she was on active duty, backpay, and correction of records
        expunging any reference to mental illness.

             There is no record of any claim having been filed in the
        General Accounting Office in connection with the matters set  forth
        in the petition.  Furthermore, we have no record of any counter-
        claim, setoff, or other demand which would  furnish the basis of a
        cross action against the petitioner.

             Separation and retirement for disability  from the armed
        services are governed by the provisions of Chapter 61, Title  10,
        of the United States Code.  Generally, the Court of Claims has no
        jurisdiction over determinations by the Secretary of a military
        department withregard  to percentage of disability or  fitness for
        duty unless it can be shown  that the Secretary's determination was
        arbitrary or  capricious or not supported by substantial evidence.
        See Finn v. United States, 548 F.2d  340, 212 Ct. Cl. 353 (1977),
        and Craft v. United States,  544 F.2d 468, 210 Ct. Cl. 170 (1976).

             In addition,  it appears that the petitioner seeks relief,
        alternatively, in the nature of  damages based on her claim which

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most