About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

NSIAD-93-287R 1 (1993-09-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaobackkh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


             United States
GAO          General Accounting Office


             National Security and
             International Affairs Division

             B-248882



             September 1, 1993

             The Honorable Christopher S. Bond
             United States Senate                                 149938

             Dear Senator Bond:

             In response to your request of August 27, 1993, we are
             providing you a comparison of the costs and capabilities of
             the F/A-18E/F and the F-14D Quickstrike. This information
             was originally included in a draft of our recently issued
             report on the justification for the F/A-18E/F program.I

             Because of your concern about our handling of this issue,
             we think it is important to explain why the report excluded
             the comparison. We originally made the comparison of the
             two aircraft at the request of some members of the New York
             congressional delegation. The Navy said it had chosen the
             F/A-18E/F because the aircraft would be cheaper and more
             capable. In doing our review, we found that the Navy had
             not adequately justified the procurement of either
             aircraft. Our draft report highlighted that major issue
             and also contained the requested cost and capability
             comparison. Your office and the offices of the New York
             requesters received copies of that draft.

             After receiving the draft report, the requesters indicated
             they were not interested in this larger issue and did not
             believe that our cost and capability analysis was
             comprehensive enough. Because of the significance of our
             overall finding on the lack of justification for the
             F/A-18E/F program, we issued our report to the Secretary of
             Defense. We did not consider it necessary to include the
             cost and capability comparison, as it was not pertinent to
             our position that the F/A-18E/F aircraft was not adequately
             justified.


             1Naval Aviation: Consider All Alternatives Before
             Proceeding With the F/A-18E/F (GAO/NSIAD-93-144, Aug. 27,
             1993).

                                        GAO/NSIAD-93-287R, Naval Aviation


                                O's-oai/I qqq3g

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most