About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

IMTEC-93-19R 1 (1993-02-01)

handle is hein.gao/gaobackfn0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

GUnited Statme
             General Aeounting Office
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             Inlornation Manaement and
             Technology Division



             B-222177


             February 1, 1993

                                                               148466
            The Honorable John D. Dingell
            Chairman, Subcommittee on Oversight
              and Investigations
            Committee on Energy and Commerce
            House of Representatives

            Dear Mr. Chairman:

            In order to assist the Subcommittee in its evaluation of the
            issues raised in our report Securities and Exchange
            Commission: Effective Development of the EDGAR System
            Reauires Top Management Attention (GAO/IMTEC-92-85, Sept. 30,
            1992), you requested that we review and comment on the
            Securities and Exchange Commission's letter to you of
            December 17, 1992. In this letter, SEC takes issue with
            several points in our report but generally agrees with our
            recommendations.

            SEC states that we criticize the agency for accepting a
            partially complete requirements document and for adding
            requirements thereafter. SEC also takes issue with our
            finding that management needs to exercise better control over
            the EDGAR project. SEC provides reasons for the agency's
            acceptance of a partially complete requirements document from
            the contractor and subsequent increase in system requirements
            and cost. In addition, SEC contends that top management took
            adequate measures to avoid delays in developing EDGAR.

            We believe that the reasons SEC provides for accepting an
            incomplete requirements document and tolerating EDGAR's
            spiraling growth are flawed and that available evidence shows
            that top management distanced itself from active oversight of
            EDGAR, particularly between the start of the EDGAR contract
            in January 1989 and the summer of 1991. We agree that some
            of the actions SEC planned and later implemented in late 1992
            may put EDGAR back on track. However, the effectiveness of
            these actions cannot be determined. For example, SEC did not
            provide detailed information on progress toward (1)
            prioritizing users' needs, (2) setting realistic project

                                       GAO/IMTEC-93-19R SEC: EDGAR Update

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most