About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

NSIAD-89-41BR 1 (1988-12-09)

handle is hein.gao/gaobacipt0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



             United States
GAO          General Accounting Office
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             National Security and
             International Affairs Division

             B'229489


             December 9, 1988


             The Honorable John C. Stennis
             Chairman, Subcommittee on Defense
             Committee on Appropriations
             United States Senate

             Dear Mr. Chairman:

             As you requested, we reviewed the Department of Defense's
             (DOD) Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Master Plan to assess its
             adequacy and compliance with congressional intent. This was
             an interim assessment of the Master Plan's provisions. We
             did not evaluate the issues of service requirements for UAVs
             or the potential for commonality in UAVs. These issues are
             being addressed in a separate assignment.

             DOD submitted the UAV Master Plan on June 27, 1988. We
             earlier briefed your representatives on our assessment. This
             letter summarizes the results of our analysis of the plan,
             and appendix I discusses it in more detail. Appendix II
             describes our objective, scope, and methodology.

             BACKGROUND

             Each of the military services is acquiring pilotless aircraft
             resembling small airplanes or helicopters, which are commonly
             referred to as UAVsI or Remotely Piloted Vehicles (RPVs) or
             drones. These UAVs are being developed to accomplish several
             military functions, such as surveillance of enemy activities,
             relay of friendly communications, or attack of enemy radars.
             Over the next few years, DOD expects to spend over $6 billion
             on UAV programs.

             Over the past few years, various congressional committees
             have expressed concern about duplication in service UAV
             programs. Their concern is that the services are developing
             and procuring systems that are different in design but have
             common service mission requirements such as reconnaissance


             ISome congressional reports use the term RPV. The Master
             Plan uses the term UAV, and this term is generally used in
             this report.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most