About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

GGD-85-38 1 (1985-03-14)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabnpr0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                     UNITED STATM GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548                    v9


G68E1RAL GOVERNME1NT
    DIVISION

    B-217512                                         MARCH 14,1985
    The Honorable Michael G. Oxley
    House of Representatives

    Dear Mr. Oxley:

          Subject: (ISA's Sale of a Surplus Federal Warehouse
                    in Shelby, Ohio (GAO/GGD-85-38)

          By letter dated June 4, 1984, you requested that we inves-
     tigate the General Services Administration's (GSA) recent sale
     of a surplus GSA warehouse in Shelby, Ohio. You pointed out in
     your letter that, in August 1983, GSA rejected a company's bid
     of $2 million for the surplus warehouse but then, in April 1984,
     accepted a $1,369,000 bid for the warehouse from another com-
     pany. You expressed your concern that GSA could have gotten
     $631,000 more for the warehouse 9 months earlier and asked us to
     investigate the matter.

          In our inquiry into this matter we interviewed GSA offi-
     cials responsible for real property disposals in GSA's central
     office and its Chicago region, which administered the warehouse
     sale. We reviewed the laws, regulations, policies, and proce-
     dures which govern GSA's sale of surplus real property and
     examined central office and Chicago region files and records
     pertinent to the sale. We developed the disposal history on
     this sale and compared it to the established policies and proce-
     dures for GSA's surplus property sales. We did not attempt to
     evaluate the validity of the appraisals of the warehouse's value
     that were prepared by independent appraisers and evaluated by
     GSA appraisers.

          On August 2, 1984, we met with you and briefed you on the
     information on the sale that we had developed in our inquiry.
     At that time, you requested that we provide you the information
     in writing. The enclosure contains the information we provided
     you at the meeting.

          In summary, we advised you that we learned that GSA's
     Chicago region rejected the August 1983 $2 million bid because
     it believed, based on an independent appraisal and the region's
     evaluation of that appraisal, that the bid was too low. The



                                                     (014005)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most