About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

NSIAD-84-129 1 (1984-06-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabnkj0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                    ~ID ~                                         2    .S 35
                       UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                               WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


  NATIONAL SECURITY AND
INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS DIVISION


    B-214271
                                      June 26, 1984

    The Honorable Sam M. Gibbons
    Chairman, Subcommittee on Trade
    Committee on Ways and Means                                124535
    House of Representatives

    Dear Mr. Chairman:

         Subject: Judicial Review of Antidumping and
                   Countervailing Decisions (GAO/NSIAD-84-129)

         In response to your letter of February 28, 1983, concerning
    trade remedy laws and to subsequent discussions with your staff,
    we reviewed the impact of certain changes made by the Trade
    Agreements Act of 1979 to the antidumping and countervailing
    duty laws.   Specifically, we looked at the new provisions for
    judicial review of decisions (determinations) by the Department
    of Commerce and International Trade Commission (ITC) and for
    suspension of Commerce investigations through agreements reached
    with foreign exporters. This letter discusses our work concern-
    ing the judicial review process; suspension agreements were ad-
    dressed in a separate report dated June 15, 1984 (GAO/NSIAD-84-
    125).                   1 1

         A major feature of the new judicial review provisions was
    the appeal of certain interlocutory      (interim) decisions by
    Commerce and ITC in antidumping and countervailing cases.     The
    Customs Court Act of 1980 also significantly affected the nature
    and scope of judicial review of such cases.      Enclosure I dis-
    cusses the background and impact of the changes in judicial
    review provided by the 1979 Trade Act and the 1980 Customs Court
    Act. Enclosure II lists the administrative determinations which
    may be appealed to the Court of International Trade (CIT).

         We found that, from January, 1980 through July 1983, the
    CIT disposed of three matters (dispositions) involving        two
    interlocutory appeals of agency determinations. This amounts to
    2.2 percent of total CIT dispositions during our review period.


                                                           (483387)


029'411 51I

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most