About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

OACG-84-4 1 (1984-04-17)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabniu0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                   COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                             WASHINGTON D.C 20648


B-209565
                                                 APRIL 17, 1984


The Honorable Ralph Reaula                        IIIIij111
The Honorable Norman Mineta
The Honorable Leon F. Panetta
The Honorable Ed Bethune                              124036
House of Representatives

     Subject: Biennial Budgeting: Summary of the
               Major Issues GAO/OACG-84-4

     This report is in response to your reauest that GAO study
the feasibility and advisability of lengthening the budget cycle
to a 2-year period. As part of that study, you reouested that we
look at state experience with biennial budgeting; identify work-
load and timetable problems that have surfaced in the existing
congressional process; and identify alternative ways in which the
Congress could implement a biennial budget. The results of our
state work (GAO/PAD-83-14) were provided to you by letter dated
December 23, 1982. We provided your staff with an analysis of
the various biennial budgetina bills, briefed them from time-to-
time on biennial budgeting issues, and also provided them with a
larger, detailed draft version of this report. In this final re-
port, we summarize the major issues.

GENERAL APPPOACH

     We studied the experiences of three states--Wisconsin, Ohio,
and Florida--to learn how a biennial budget process operates.
We chose these states using several criteria, including imple-
menting a biennial budget in a variety of ways; debating in the
last few years whether biennial budgeting is appropriate; sus-
taining a high level of competition for limited resources; and
having different annual adjustment mechanisms, to name a few.
These states illustrate some of the many ways a biennial budget
can be implemented and enabled us to identify those issues raised
by the use of a biennial budget. However, the three states do
not exhaust the possible ways of managing a biennial budget.
Different issues might have emerged had we looked at a different
set of states. We concentrated on portions of the state budget
processes that bear directly on the problems currently faced in
the congressional budget process, such as timing, workload, and
budqet estimates. Knowledge of biennial budgeting in the state
examples was drawn from interviews with state officials and docu-
ment collection and analysis.



                                      )q   4 D(974618)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most