About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

GGD-83-96 1 (1983-08-29)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabncz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                     UNITEP £XATI GENERA 1rCC UNT IN OFFICE
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. Z050!.                 .'


GENERAL GOVERNMENT
    DIVISION

    B-21 1155                                     AUGUST 29,1983



    The Honorable Donald J. Albosta
    Chairman, Subcommittee on Human
       Resources
     Committee on Post Office and
       Civil Service
     Rouse of Representatives

     Dear Mr. Chairman:

          Subject:   Review of Selected Agencies' Intergovernmental
                     Personnel Act Assignments (GAO/GGD-83-96)

           In response to an August 20, 1982, request from the
     Subcommittee's former Chairwoman, we reviewed assignments made
     under Title IV of the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970
     (IPA). This title provides for the temporary assignment of
     cersonne7 between Federal agencies and other organizations for
     work of mutual concern and benefit. The Chairwoman's concerns
     were that agencies might be paying a greater share of IPA assign-
     ment costs than the benefits warranted and that some assignments
     might be of little benefit to the Federal Government or to the
     agency paying for the service. This letter presents the results
     of our review.

           We reviewed all 436 IPA assignment agreements on file at the
      Departments of Health and Human Services (HHS), Interior, and
      Commerce and at the Environmental Protection Aqencv (EPA). The
      assignments all started between January 1, 1981, and August 31,
      1982. We did not consider extensions of assignments begun before
      January 1, 1981, as new assignments; therefore we did not include
      them in our review. Although most assignments appeared proper,
      with appropriate cost-sharing arrangements, 15 percent (66) of
      them did not.

           We believe that, for 20 of the 66 assignments, the four
      agencies paid a greater share of the costs than the benefits
      warranted. We consider the 46 other assignments questionable be-
      cause they were not consistent with the IPA or with regulations
      and policies set by OPM, which is responsible for overseeing the
      program. Thirty-four of these 46 questionable assignments in-
      volved Indian Health Service (HHS) employees who were assigned to
      various Indian health care facilities and would not return to
                                        , / j <(966132)

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most