About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-238482.2 1 (1992-09-18)

handle is hein.gao/gaobablgz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                                                                    1~t< J

             United States
GAO       ' General Accounting Office
             Washington, D.C. 20548

             Office of the General Counsel


             B-238482.2

             September 18, 1992

             Henry, Watz, Gardner and Sellars
             Victorian Square - Suite 314
             401 West Main Street
             Lexington, Kentucky 40507

             Attention: James W. Gardner

             Gentlemen:

             Your letter of March 18, 1992 appeals the determination of
             the Defense Finance and Accounting Service that no survivor
             benefits are payable to the heirs of Ah Doo, a deceased
             retired member of the U.S. Navy.
             In B-238842, July 5, 1991, 70 Comp. Gen.     , we concluded
             that the barring act, /1 U.S.C. § 3702(b), did not bar the
             payment of military retired pay and survivor benefits, if
             any, withheld from payment to Ah Doo, a retired Navy member
             who resided in China until his death in 1965, or to his
             survivors, during the period when relations between the
             United States and China were severed. Relations were
             severed in 1949 and renewed in 1989. We remanded the case
             to the Navy for settlement after its determination of the
             amounts of military retired pay and any survivor benefits
             actually withheld during the period in question and the
             proper payees of any such amounts.

             A March 2, 1992 letter from the Defense Finance and
             Accounting Service confirms that back retired pay has been,
             in fact, paid to the proper beneficiary, as contemplated by
             our decision. The letter also states that as no survivor
             benefits appear to have been elected, and no premiums were
             paid, we take the position that no such payments are owing.

             You argue that it would not have been possible for Ah Doo to
             have elected or rejected survivor benefits or to have paid
             premiums for them during the period that diplomatic
             relations were severed between China and the United States.
             You request that survivor benefits be awarded and that any
             premiums due for the period between 1949, the year relations
             were terminated, and 1965, the year of Ah Doo's death, be
             deducted from the amount otherwise due the survivors.

             We are not aware of any authority that would allow
             retroactive establishment of survivor benefits under the
             circumstances of this case. The Uniformed Services




                                 055501I/

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most