About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-133025 1 (1972-03-03)

handle is hein.gao/gaobablde0001 and id is 1 raw text is:         . ..RET  CTEV--- Not to be I*Ieasd eutdde the OGeeral
            o tbei hsq, Of S                   approval
R ELIEASED ;y iji'e O-g~r of Co;%gr ofiotl                    /  g01

                 COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE
                         WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548
                                               B 0     MAR 3 1972
  B- 133 025 -

  Dear Senator Fong:

       On August 31, 1971, you forwarded for our review a let-
  ,ter you had received from Mr. R. Donald Brough, concerning the
  use of Military Airlift Commaytd (MAC flights by Government    7
  emIlo'eesj. In his letter Mr. Brough stated that the use of
  MAC flights, as segments of flights while en route to or from
  commercial airports, is not advantageous to either the Govern-
  ment or the passenger under any of the usual criteria--cost,
  time, or convenience. Mr. Brough cited two personal experi-
  ences to support his contention--a trip from Honolulu, Hawaii,
  to Hong Kong and a trip from Honolulu to Syracuse, New York.

       Presented below is a report of our findings.

  ROUTING VIA MAC SOMETIMES MORE COSTLY
  THAN VIA COMMERCIAL CARRIERS

       Mr. Brough attempted to show, through comparative cost
  calculations, that it cost the Government more to route him on
  MAC than to route him on commercial air carriers--taking into
  account his salary, per diem, ground transportation, and wait-
  ing time. Although we found inaccuracies in his calculations
  for both trips, our calculations confirmed Mr. Brough's conten-
  tion that the use of a MAC flight for a segment of his trans-
  portation to Hong Kong had resulted in excess cost to the
  Government. On the trip to Syracuse, we found that the use of
  MAC facilities had resulted in savings to the Government.

       Based on our calculation, the cost to the Government for
  a round trip to Hong Kong from Honolulu (as Mr. Brough was
  routed) was $460.75, compared with a cost of $358.20 had he
  been routed by commercial carrier at category Z1 rates. De-
  tails of our calculation follow.



  1 Category Z is service on regular commercial flights at re-
  duced rates when transportation is procured by using a Gov-
  ernment Transportation Request.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most