About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-201695 1 (1981-10-21)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabkfs0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                 g/&q3 7



                     UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

                                        October 21, 1981


         B-201695


         The Honorable William Bradford Reynolds
         Assistant Attorney General
         Civil Rights Division
         Department of Justice

         Dear Mr. Reynolds:

              This is in response to your letter of August 21, 1981,
         concerning Executive Order 12250, 45 Fed. Reg. 72995 (1980),
         entitled Leadership and Coordination of Nondiscrimination
         Laws. That order assigns responsibility to the Attorney
         General for coordinating the implementation and enforcement
         by executive agencies of: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act
         of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d, et sea.); Title IX of the
         Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. § 1681 et sea.);
         Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C.
         S 794); and any other provision of Federal statutory law
         which prohibits discrimination under any program or activity
         receiving Federal financial assistance.

              You note in your letter that while for the most part the
         above laws apply only to programs receiving Federal financial
         assistance, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act was amended
         in 1978 to proscribe discrimination on the basis of handicap
         under any program or activity conducted by any Executive
         agency or by the United States Postal Service. You conclude
         that because the General Accounting Office (GAO) falls within
         the definition of Executive agency as stated in 5 U.S.C.
         S 105, this Office is covered under Section 504 of the
         Rehabilitation Act and is subject to the provisions of Execu-
         tive Order 12250 for purposes of that Act. You request our
         views on this conclusion.

              We do not believe that the title 5 definition of Execu-
         tive agency should be applied in :hese circumstances. For
         that reason, and for the other reasons stated below, we fee.
         that the GAO is exempt from the requirements of Executive
         Order 12250.


o 1 3\

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most