About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-198352 1 (1981-06-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabkbo0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 



                         UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                                   WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL                             June 2?2, 1981

          In Reply
          Refer To: B-198352





          The Honorable Thomas S. Martin
          Acting Assistant Attorney General
          Civil Division
          U.S. Department of Justice

          Dear Mr. Martin:

               We are presenting for your consideration the claim of the heirs of
          Mr. Vernon Alvin Reibach, which was referred to us for settlement by the
          Bureau of Indian Affairs, Department of the Interior. The details of this
          claim are discussed in our decision of today, B-198352, copy enclosed, in
          which we held that the Department of the Interior could not pay this claim
          from funds appropriated to it for other purposes. However, since their
          attorneys have threatened to litigate this matter, you may wish to consider
          this claim under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2414 and to enter into a
          compromise settlement with the claimants, Mr. Reibach's heirs.

               Briefly, the Indian Claims Commission awarded the Northern Paiute
          Nation three separate judgments as compensation for land taken from them.
          The Congress appropriated sufficient monies to pay these judgments. Pur-
          suant to a plan authorized by statute, the Secretary of the Interior pre-
          pared and approved a Northern Paiute descendant roll and distributed the
          entire appropriated amount (less certain litigation expenses) to the
          persons, or their heirs, on the roll. It was later determined that
          Mr. Reibach was erroneously excluded from the roll and that he was en-
          titled to his proprtionate share of the award. Since the sum appro-
          priated had already been distributed, we were asked to rule on whether
          Interior's approoriations could be used to pay Mr. Peibach's share. In
          our decision we note that the award was for a set amount in which all mem-
          bers of the Nation were to share equally and that Congress appropriated
          that amount to pay it. Our view is that this appropriation is the ex-
          clusive one available to pay this award and that since it is now exhausted,
          Interior is without funds available to pay this claim.

               We note, however, that Mr. Reibach's heirs have retained counsel and
          have threatened to bring suit if an administrative settlement in their
          favor is not reached. Since Mr. Reibach was entitled to share in the
          award and since Interior's erroneous exclusion of him from the rolls until
          after it distributed the full amount of the award was the cause of the




                                     621736

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most