About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-202380 1 (1981-04-28)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabkai0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





  GAO
  United States General Accounting Office                    Office of I
  Washington, DC 20548                                       General Counsel
                                                             In Reply
                                                             Refer to:  B-202380
  Mr. Thomas 0. Mann
  Acting Deputy Director                               April 28, 1981
  Office of Hearings and Appeals
  Department of Energy
  Washington, D.C. 20461

  Dear Mr. Mann:

            Re: Case No. DFF-0006

       In response to your request, we submit the following comments with
  regard to the Proposed Decision and Order in the captioned case, concern-
  ing the jdsposition of funds obtained                                   . hu
  through a consent ordeDrbetweenEnergy's Office of Enforcement and the
(Vickers Energy Corporation.'

       In our opinion, this proposed disposition of settlement funds is
  not in compliance with the interpretation of Energy's authority to order
  restitutf- set forthn our opinion of October 10, 1980 (B-200170, 60
  Comp. Gen.   ), and April 1, 1981 (B-200170) prepared for the current
  Chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, copies of which
  were provided to Energy. For your convenience, we have enclosed a copy
  of the April 1 opinion.

       In these opinions we analyzed the statutory framework under which
  Energy operates, and pointed out thatrthe only specific grant of
  restitutionary power in that legislation/)is found in section 209 of
  the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970, as amended, 12 U.S.C. § 1904
  note, and s limited to actions which can be taken by the United States
  District Courts. We also stated that in Bonray Oil Co. v. Department
  of Energy, 472 F. Supp. 899 (W.D. Okla. 1978), aff'd per curiam, 601 F. 2d
  1191 (TECA 1979), the cou-r ruled that Energy's predecessor had the power
,; to order a violator of its regulations to make refunds to the customers
  it had overcharged    nergy's authority is-imilarlyjiimited.

      4JNowhere in Energy's enabling legislation is Energy's administrative
  remedial power delineated (other than granting it the power to issue
  remedial orders), nor is its responsibility regarding settlement funds
  set forth. Rather, the legislation contains broad statements of purpose
  and policy, and no authority is expressly granted to Energy--or to the
  administrative components of Energy responsible for the energy price
  and allocation programs--to promote the interests of consumers in general
  through direct payments to them or through grants made on their behalf
  to states or other entities. Nowhere in Energy's enabling legislation




  o-

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most