About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-102963 1 (1979-03-16)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabjjw0001 and id is 1 raw text is:  - to-

          % [ /_  - \COMPTPOLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED $TATEW
                WqA!HIFGTON. C.C. 3QUS                                   qf
          B]-o2963                                 Marah 16, .979



          Tha Honorable Joseph G. inish                              ........ Vd ,.:.
          ChaIrman, Subcommittee on General
            Oversight and Rnegotiation
          Committee on Banking, Finance and
            Urban Af fairs
          House of Representatives
          D6ar Mr, Chirman:
               This is In response to your request onkMarch.8, 1979, that\We
          summarize the iformation that we-obtained on thejj sts, of comfriance
          with the Renegotiation Act of 1951, as AmidedJ(50 ,SC.pllIet,
          ?eg.).  Our work w:os conducted ateighf-contractoi, offiQies, two industry
          associations, and the RenegotiationBoard, ,This Nprk was perfo ied from
          June to'September T977.at the reqvest of SenatorP-,ogmi re't'and lip'lited to
          contractors 'and industry associations that had testified at a heaing
          iId agreed to make their records available for reviw. Our Specific
          obJetivewas to as;certain if, as claimed by cqntraitors; there were sub-
          stantial costs incurred for complying'with the requirements of the
          Rnegotiatlon Act. We also evaluated'studies preparpd.by Industry asso-
          ciations attempting to deter'ine the extent of siuch 4rosts .
               In general, we concluded 'that some costs were necessarily itcurred
          by'contractors to comply with adnegotiatibn Act requi' 'ments, We were
          unable, however, to determine the:magnitude of such cvsts-or to what
          extent they'are incremental to other financial data costs,. The primary
          problem in determining' and verifying such costs was .th,'t the, contractors
          accounting systems were not designed to idenf;fy and segregate such data.
               It is important to note that, becatise of unusual a.ipects of;'the firms
          that testified before the comttee chair'ed by Senator iroxmire, any con-
          clusions drawn fron the data are unlikelytobe represerntatve' of. the
          approximately 3,000 firms that file with the Board.  Tojillustrate:
          One contractor claimed and obtained exemptions for about\75 percent of~i
          its otherwise renegotiable sales. Under the Act, contractors, could claim
          examptions for standard commercial articles, standard coronercial classes,
          and new durable productive equipment for otherwise renegotiable sales to
          the Government. This contractor accounted for 8.percent of all exemptionrs
          granted to all firms. The large amount claimed was costly to-document. ,




-.      ., ' - - -,0~.         - -      . - ..              . .             . - .

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most