About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-205145 1 (1981-11-02)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabjaw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


                     UNITED STATES GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


O71CE OF GENERAL COUNSEL                -           *

         B-205145                                 November 2, 1981


         The Honorable Donald J. Mitchell
         House of Representatives

         Dear Mr. Mitchell:

              This is in response to your letter of September 30,
         1981, forwarding a protest on behalf of A&R Security-
         Patrols and Investigations, Inc. against cancellation by
         the General Services Administration (GSA) of a solicita-
         tion for security guards for Federal buildings in the
         areas of Albany, Troy, and Schenectady, New York.

              The letter from Rocco J. DePaul, president of A&R,
         to your office indicates that on September 23, 1981,
         the firm was advised that GSA had found the solicitation,
         Project No. 2PPB-PF-19,719, ambiguous and planned to
         resolicit. A&R, the incumbent contractor and only bidder,
         contends that the solicitation was not ambiguous and that
         it should have been awarded the contract.

              A&R's letter, along with yours, was not received
         in this Office until October 8, 1981, and is therefore
         untimely under our Bid Protest Procedures, 4 C.F.R. § 21.2
         (1981). These procedures require that protestsbe filed--
         defined as received--with GAO within 10 working days after
         the basis for them is known or should have been known,
         whichever is earlier. Thus, in order to be considered on
         the merits, A&R's protest should have reached GAO no later
         than October 7, 1981.

              Our timeliness standards are strictly construed, and
         are applied regardless of whether a protest is filed di-
         rectly by a-protester, through counsel, or through a con-
         gressional representative. They were adopted in order to
         permit us to decide an issue while it still may be prac-
         ticable to recommend corrective action, if warranted. The
         only exceptions are when good cause is shown or when a pro-
         test raises a significant issue; the former means that some
         compelling reason, beyond the control of the protester, has

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most