About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

MASAD-81-29 1 (1981-05-15)

handle is hein.gao/gaobabbxw0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 

                  COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                           WASHINGTON O-Q sa



B-203043                                              MAY 15, 1981

The Honorable Caspar W. Weinberger
The Secretary of Defense

     Attention: Assistant for Audit Reports
                                                            115243
Dear Mr. Secretary:

     Subject: Improving the Weapon Systems Acquisition Process
                MASAD-81-29)

     We are pleased to note the initiatives you and Deputy
Secretary Frank Carlucci have taken-in your efforts to improve
the weapon systems acquisition process.

     In his March 2, 1981, memorandum to the military secretaries
and others, Mr. Carlucci included a list of concerns that the
Steering Group he appointed was to address. We believe it may
be helpful to you to have our views on some of these concerns
to consider along with the suggestions you received from the
Steering group and others you have solicited. In general, these
represent opinions which are based on the many reviews we have
made of acquisition programs over the past several years. We rec-
ognize that these are not necessarily the only approaches that
might be taken to improve the acquisition process.

LOWERING WEAPON SYSTEM COSTS

     The Deputy Secretary's memorandum expresses concern that
evolutionary product improvement of existing hardware is not
receiving its due in the Department of Defense's consideration
of how to develop greater capability to meet new needs.

     From what we have seen, there have been occasional instances
of the military improving its weapon systems for extended periods
through modification programs. Examples are the F-4, the B-52,
and the HAWK missile. If the services are to be faulted, it is
because, in establishing the needs for a new system, they fre-
quently set their performance requirements higher than necessary,
in effect, guaranteeing that existing systems, even with improve-
ments, cannot compete with new concepts. These requirements are
often driven by a desire to take full advantage of advances in
technology more than by actual need. More critical analysis of
proposed requirements before they are approved may help keep per-
formance at an affordable and achievable range and also, give
existing systems a better chance to compete.







                            6/ 54

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most