About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-160877 1 (1974-06-24)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaafov0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 


.0S.LER a,
                  COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                            WASHINGTON. D.C. 20548



 B- 16 0877                                   JUN 241974



 The Honorable Les Aspin                                 IIIIi IIl l IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII III
 House of Representatives                                     LM095817

 Dear Mr. Aspin:

        We have inquired into certain aspects of the N ayLsSbmarine
 Emergency Communications Transmitter (E9&      ?9gKam in response
 to your January 3, 1974, letter and subsequent discussions with your
 office.

      Our examination was directed primarily to the circumstances
 surrounding the Navy's decision not to terminate the fiscal year 1973
 pgp d   toontract for the SECT buoys and related equipment. As dis-
 cussed below, we found that the Navy might have saved about $2. 1 mil-
 lion had it terminated the contract by the end of November 1972.

      In addition, we obtained information on the nine questions concern-
 ing the SECT program in your December 26, 1973, and January 28, 1974,
 letters to the Navy.

      As discussed with your office, in view of the claims currently
 before the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, we did not look
 into the allegations of Mr. Lewis D. Malnak regarding his dealings with
 the Navy on a program for developing and producing the receivers used
 with the SECT buoys.

      A summary of our findings follows.

 PROGRAM HISTORY

      The Navy's submarine fleet is composed of three broad types of
 vessels designated as the SS, the SSN, and the SSBN. SS and SSN ves-
 sels are attack-type submarines; SS vessels are diesel powered and SSN
 vessels are nuclear powered. The SSBNs are nuclear-powered ballistic
 missile vessels and are part of our country's strategic military force.
 Thus, from a strategic point of view, the loss of an SSBN submarine
 would have a greater impact on our national defense than would the loss
 of an SS or SSN.

      As early as 1959, the Navy established a requirement that SSBNs be
 provided with a system for alerting appropriate command levels when one
 of the vessels and its strategic weapons system had been lost. In fiscal
 year 1960, the Navy began spending Xes~ergxanQ .~eyv ! ent funds for
 this requirement. Not until after the loss of the SSN Thresher in 1964,
 however, were specific recommendations made on the urgent need for a


      lg~t4fO Ti -

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most