About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

B-158549 1 (1974-01-22)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaadqh0001 and id is 1 raw text is: £ .1 COMrTROLLU oGENERAL OFTHE UNI1TE STATES WAS HINQ*TO, D.C.3SOW S-1456549 January 22, 197T4 The lLonorable Arthur F. Samrpson Administrator CeneHral Services Admlniutration Dear Hr. Sampson: W:e have for consideration the claims of Hassrs. Jacob , Amstutz, Names A. Buyer, Moses Brown, Clarence A. Delaine, Fred L. Jones, William 4. Jones, Emal Jordan, Hilton Joseph Sion, Jones S. Smallwood, William R. Smith and Melvin H. Streets, Those 11 individuals, all past or present mabners of the Federal Protective Service, GSA, RuSion Xi10 have[lainf&Iectime compensationin accordance vith the holding by the Court of Clains in EugieL. Baylor et a!. v, United States, 198 C. Cl., 331 (1972). Finding that the overtime activities involved had been officially ordered and approved by appropriate Region IXI officials, the Court held that each of the 33 plaintiffs who testified and presented evidence was entitled to recover insofar as he had substantiated his claim. The Trial Connissioner, phose opinion with modifications was adopted by the Court, Pceliminary to outlining the pertinent facts, one matter relating to the prosecution of this cnse by plain- tiffs and the evidence introduced herein by them thould be briefly mentioned at this point. An average time ,'Sqisired each workday for the plaintiffs to comnply with the guard force regulations acd alleged work 'orders' is not claimed by them. Rather, each of the plaintiffs who testified iu this case claims entitlement to compensation for'different samounts of preshift and postshift overcimc assertedly necessarily performed by him. The difference In the amounts of. overtime claimed by each plaintiff guard in largely attributable to the variations in the individual's situation ith respect to the location of hie assigned locker, gun issue, point, and duty post d~ring the claim period. In vlew of the foregoing and other circunstauces presented here, it was considered ensential that each of the 47 plainr.iffs still in this case should teotify concerning his &A individual situation in support of the claim ad- v.ced by him. Under the ground rules established for che conduct of the trial held herein, it was contemplated ! ':='G u .... ..... C / ? a /

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most