About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-177542(2) 1 (1973-05-23)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaadoq0001 and id is 1 raw text is:  iI


             LEA C

                        COMPThOLLEIt GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATIZ
                                  W'ql -II70H er  o, D.C. 20549


          fla17751$k-2't                       fy 23, 1973




          The Honorable Howard It, 'GJafay
          'the Secretary of the Army

          Dear Mr, Eserotary:

               Reference is nmade to A latter, f, GC-P, dated Febrary 5,
          1973# from the.Deputy General Counnel Headquarters, United
          States Army )hteriel Comnand  concerning the protost of Draddcck1
          Dunn and &tDonald, Incorporated (3DM), against ,%%rd of a con-
          tract to another firm under requeut for propoati flo. DAADO7-
          72fR-O69, issued June 30 1972, by the United taten Arw
          SLectrocs Ooninnd Fort Mnmoth, flev Jersey.

               Enclosed i a copy or our decision of today to the protesting
          firm denying its protest. We hate concluded that the lack of
          neotiation. with D!   w Justifited becau 3eDM received such a
          low technical merit; rting score that nnnhg     nesotiutions were
K.        not possible, e owever, we believe that the record 4n the instant
          cae is less than convincing in attempting to justify the procuring
          activity's Caflure to conduct any technical discusion  solclY on
          the basls of' avoiding technical transfusion or loveling. ta-
          thcuah we recognize that it 1n within the ambit of administrative
          discrotion to linit technical dincusniono to avoid tranfus.on
          or ovelizn, we believe that the totli absenca of any such da-
          cus3ions, vri'ten or oral, for at least the purpose of seeking
          cariictio't', amy not ordinarily be justified. 51 Co=p. Gen.
          621 (1972). 1, erefore, ve ug est that cognizant procurement
          personnel be advised that in view of the ctatutory requirement fcT
          conducting .vningtft  dicaunsiona, 10 U.S.C. 230Z(g), our Office
          vil closely scrutinize the juetification for failing to egace in
          ruch diuauwtsions on the lbanis of avoiding teeluiical traniituion or
          levelingegtg

                                           flierely youra,

                                              Paul G. DonbliPE

                                  For, ,: Cotronler General
                                           of the Uniteg States


                   L~f~~4  4'A Iit~ Q~4~~ /1tdact

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most