About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

B-175155(1) 1 (1976-07-26)

handle is hein.gao/gaobaacuv0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 
                               DIG=ST    NO cCULT1.

                         COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
                                    WASHINGTON, D.C. 20548


     1,1751556i)

                                                         --        JUL 2 6 1976
     rg Honorable Vance Hartke, Chairman
     subcomittee on Surface Transportation
     coilttee on Commerce
                                                                             087695
  -puar Mr. Chairmans-

         This is in reply to your letter of March 30, 1976, submitted jointly
     with Senator Warren G. Magnuson, Chairman, Comnittee on Comnerce, re-
     questing our review of the purchase of the Northeast Corridor on April 1,
     1976, by the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) from the
     Scnsolidated Rail Corporation (ConRail). The Federal Railroad Adnin-
 K/, hltration, Department of Transportation (DOT), has taken the position
 that the Antideficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. 1 665, nfrs, prohibits it from
     oigvLding grant funds to Amtrak to directly or indirectly finance the
u rchase. For reasons to be discus$ed below, we believe that the purchase
     is not legally objectionable and that the withholding of grant funds was
     not justified.

         Since our consideration of the issues involves the complex interrela-
    .'tionship of severA statutes, we will outline the pertinent statutory pro-
    visions before proceeding to discuss the issues.

    fin                         STATUTORY BACKGROUND

         Faced with the potentially massive disruption of rail services in
     wtain areas of the country due to the insolvency of several railroads,
     Congress enacted the Regional Rail Reorganization Act of 1973 Pub L.
     D. 93-236 (January 2, 1974), 87 Stat. 985,: 45 U.S.C. 41 70I.t _.     The
     t presented a schee for the reorganization and consolidation of the
,aUnkrupt railroads, with the ultimate goal of providing adequate and
     efficient rail services. Congress recognised that a major element of any
   ,;ouch reorgansation was the revitalization of rail transportation in the
   ANorthaast Corridor, the densely populated and heavily urbanized trip
   I from Boston to Washington. Congress further recognized that Amtrak must
   Play a major role in the reorganization of rail passenger service in the
   krtheast Corridor.

        Title IYf the Act estabfished the United States Railway Association
    (USRA)g a nonprofit goverrnent corporation of the District of Columbia, and
    Charged it with the reorganization's central planning function. USRA was
    directed to prepare a Preliminary Systen Plan and a Final System Plan! the
    lattir of which was to go into effect after approval by Congress and review

  Ieg
  AN


           '*  ' .- ..    . .: : :H ,. : . ',- '- .' ' ( '' ,• ' . -- .

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most