About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline
LOG IN
LOG IN

1 1 (February 3, 2025)

handle is hein.crs/govesij0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Con ~ orrnii February 3, 2025 Selected Issues in Tax Reform: The Deduction for State and Local Taxes Members of Congress are currently debating legislative options related to the deduction for state and local taxes paid (or SALT deduction), which is among the largest tax expenditures in the federal income tax system. P.L. 115-97 (often referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, TCJA) both directly and indirectly changed the SALT deduction, most notably by limiting the amount of nonbusiness taxes that can be claimed under the deduction (the SALT cap) and roughly doubling the standard deduction. Those changes are scheduled to expire after the 2025 tax year. This In Focus summarizes the deduction and briefly examines policy issues that may be relevant to SALT reform. For more extensive analysis of the SALT deduction, see CRS Report RL32781, Federal Deductibility of State and Local Taxes. Summary and Le atve Back round All individual taxpayers who itemize their deductions (rather than claiming the standard deduction) may claim a SALT deduction when filing a federal tax return. Business taxpayers, in contrast, may deduct state and local taxes as a cost of doing business. Qualifying taxpayers may claim deductions for state and local real estate taxes, personal property taxes, and either income taxes or sales taxes when calculating taxable federal income. As with all deductions, the savings to individual taxpayers equals the taxpayer's marginal tax rate multiplied by the amount of the deduction. The SALT deduction was established by the Revenue Act of 1913 and subsequently modified on many occasions. Changes in the decades prior to enactment of the TCJA include repeal of the deduction for sales taxes by the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-514), temporary instatement of a deduction for sales taxes in lieu of income taxes by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA 2004, P.L. 108-357), and permanent incorporation of the sales taxes deduction in lieu of income taxes by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016 (P.L. 114-113). The TCJA reformed both the SALT deduction and other tax deductions in ways that affected SALT uptake. These changes included (1) limiting SALT deduction claims to $10,000 (or $5,000 for married taxpayers filing separately) for any taxes not paid in the carrying on of a trade or business; (2) prohibiting claims for foreign real property taxes; (3) roughly doubling the value of the standard deduction; and (4) reducing the value of other itemized deductions. All of those changes are effective for tax years 2018 through 2025, reverting to prior law in tax year 2026. The changes in the TCJA reduced both the share of taxpayers claiming a SALT deduction and the average amount deducted, as seen in Table 1. In tax year 2022, 9% of tax returns claimed a SALT deduction, less than one- third of the comparable total in 2017 (31%), the last year before the TCJA changes took effect. The average SALT deduction decreased by a little more than $5,000 over those years. Table I. SALT Deduction Claims and Value by Year % of Returns Tax Year with Deduction Average Claim 2017 31% $13,400 2022 9% $8,100 Source: Internal Revenue Service, CRS calculations. Note: Claim amounts rounded to nearest hundred. The TCJA's effects on SALT deduction activity were dampened in many states by a so-called pass-through workaround that was deemed permissible by a 2020 regulation from the Internal Revenue Service. As the SALT cap does not apply to taxes paid in the carrying on of a trade or business, taxpayers whose state and local tax payments are associated with pass-through business income (including income from S corporations and partnerships) may not be subject to the SALT cap in the same manner as other taxpayers. Certain state governments have adjusted for this activity by enacting laws that levy or raise state taxes on the pass- through business entity itself that are exactly offset (holding total tax rates constant) by federal tax reductions or tax credits applied to individual income liability for pass- through business members subject to the tax increase, thereby taxing business activity and excluding such income from the $10,000 limitation for affected individual owners. More generally, the SALT deduction allows state and local governments to levy higher taxes, as the federal government effectively offsets part of taxpayers' higher state and local tax burdens. By limiting the deduction, the SALT cap increases the net cost of state and local taxes for affected taxpayers. Without a SALT cap, for example, a taxpayer with $30,000 of eligible state and local tax payments and a 37% marginal tax rate could have reduced their tax liability by $11,100 ($30,000 x 0.37) through the SALT deduction. In 2025, that same activity would reduce tax liability by $3,700 if subject to a $10,000 SALT cap ($10,000 x 0.37). All else equal, the SALT deduction is more valuable in states with higher taxes. Taxpayers in high-tax states were more likely than those in low-tax states to claim a SALT deduction both before and after the TCJA took effect, as s~~0n 2 fles~ Ier~ I Ive(ie ~1

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Purchase Access

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Contact Us

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

Log In

profiles profiles most