About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (January 22, 2025)

handle is hein.crs/govesef0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 















TikTok Inc. v. Garland: Supreme Court Rejects

Challenge to TikTok Divestiture Law



January 22, 2025

On Friday, January 17, 2025, the Supreme Court rejected a First Amendment challenge to the Protecting
Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act (PAFACAA or the act). The decision
raised immediate questions about whether TikTok, a popular social media platform that allows users to
post and view short-form videos displayed through a sophisticated content recommendation algorithm,
would be able to continue its U.S. operations. PAFACAA effectively requires TikTok to undergo a
qualified divestiture to continue distributing its application (app) to U.S. users. Specifically,
PAFACAA   makes  it unlawful to provide certain services to distribute, maintain, or update ... a foreign
adversary controlled application in the United States unless the covered application's owners complete a
transaction that deprives the foreign adversary of both control over and any operational relationship with
the application. The act expressly defines foreign adversary controlled application to include TikTok.
This Legal Sidebar discusses the background of PAFACAA, explains the Supreme Court's decision in
TikTok v. Garland, and briefly explores subsequent developments and considerations for Congress.

Background and Overview of PAFACAA

In August 2020, during his first term in office, President Trump took two executive actions that regulated
ByteDance Ltd., the ultimate owner of TikTok, and its ability to operate TikTok in the United States.
(Both actions are discussed in a prior Legal Sidebar.) First, President Trump issued Executive Order No.
13942, which exercised authority provided by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to
restrict TikTok's U.S. operations. Second, acting under Section 721 of the Defense Production Act, the
President ordered ByteDance to divest (1) assets and property used to support the operation of TikTok in
the United States and (2) data obtained from TikTok users in the United States. Both executive actions
were challenged in court. As a result, E.O. 13942 was preliminarily enjoined before it took effect.
TikTok's challenge to President Trump's divestment order was held in abeyance at the parties' request to
allow them to negotiate a resolution.
In April 2024, Congress stepped in. Congress enacted PAFACAA to regulate foreign adversary
controlled applications as well as the app stores and internet hosting services that allow users to access
those apps. PAFACAA  authorizes the President to determine that applications qualify as foreign
adversary controlled applications when they meet certain requirements, but the act was also directed at

                                                                 Congressional Research Service
                                                                   https://crsreports.congress.gov
                                                                                      LSB11261

CRS Legal Sidebar
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most