About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (June 14, 2024)

handle is hein.crs/govepgl0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Congressional Research Service
Informing the Iegisl9tive debate s~nco 1914

0

June 14, 2024
Recovering Funds from Parties Liable: Stafford Act Authorities

Introduct on
The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency
Assistance Act (the Stafford Act; P.L. 93-288, as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§5121 et seq.) authorizes the President to
provide federal response, recovery, and mitigation
assistance for emergencies and major disasters. The
President has delegated most Stafford Act authorities to the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Section
317(a) of the Stafford Act enables the federal government
to recover funds from parties liable for an emergency or
major disaster, as follows:
Party Liable-Any person who intentionally causes
a condition for which Federal assistance is provided
under this Act or under any other Federal law as a
result of a declaration of a major disaster or
emergency under this Act shall be liable to the
United States for the reasonable costs incurred by
the United States in responding to such disaster or
emergency to the extent that such costs are
attributable to the intentional act or omission of
such person which caused such condition. Such
action for reasonable costs shall be brought in an
appropriate United States district court (Section
317(a); 42 U.S.C. §5160(a)).
Some recent disasters have renewed interest in authorities
like Section 317(a) that establish financial liability for
disaster-related losses.
Background and Legislative History
The federal government did not have specific statutory
authority to recover funds from liable parties responsible
for major disasters declared under the Disaster Relief Act of
1960 (which preceded the Stafford Act). This caused
controversy when President John F. Kennedy declared
major disasters under that act to provide assistance to
remove a barge transporting liquid chlorine abandoned by
Wyandotte Transportation Co. The federal government
sued Wyandotte Transportation Co. to recover funds
expended on the barge removal and cleanup. In
,389 U.S. 191,
Wyandotte argued, and the U.S. Supreme Court agreed, that
the Disaster Relief Act of 1960 did not authorize the
government to reclaim funds from parties found liable for a
presidentially-declared disaster. The Court held that the
U.S. could recover its clean-up expenses in this case under
a different statute, the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899.
The issue of financial liability for emergencies and disasters
regained momentum after President Jimmy Carter declared
emergencies for several man-made incidents, including
the chemical contamination of the Love Canal community
by Hooker Chemical Company in 1978-79. The enactment
of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,

Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA, P.L.
96-510) established financial liability for certain parties
held responsible for releases of hazardous substances into
the environment. While CERCLA established a liability
framework for releases of hazardous substances, debate
continued over the unresolved issue of liability for the full
scope of disasters declared under the Disaster Relief Act.
The language in Section 317(a) first appeared in 1981 (S.
1216, 97th Congress). Then-FEMA Director Louis 0.
Giuffrida testified that the bill would solidify the ability of
the Federal Government to recover Federal funds where
disaster situations have been caused or aggravated by
attributable entities (Committee on Environment and
Public Works, Hearing on S. 1216, S. 1217 and S. 2250,
97th Congress, 1t session, July 16 and 21, 1981). However,
some raised concerns that proposals like S. 1216 could
enable the federal government to hold state or local
governments liable for failure to mitigate known hazards, or
for their efforts during the course of disaster response.
Following seven years of debate, Section 317(a) was
enacted on November 23, 1988, as part of the suite of
revisions codified as the Stafford Act. A second provision,
317(b), specified that a person providing care or assistance
in response to a disaster could not be held liable for the
results of those actions, and was intended to redress the
concerns that nonfederal governments might be held liable
for inadequate response measures (42 U.S.C. §5160(b)).
Imp ementat on
To recover costs under Section 317(a) from a potentially
liable party, the United States must file a claim in an
appropriate federal court. The U.S. Government
Accountability Office (GAO) reported that FEMA's Office
of Chief Counsel considers a number of factors before
pursuing a claim, including
* Whether an intentional act (or omission) can be shown
to have caused an emergency or major disaster. FEMA
reports that the agency relies on federal investigations to
determine cause and intentionality.
* The time and cost of litigation vs. the likelihood and size
of a potential award.
* How recovered assistance may affect survivors and/or
the agency. For example, FEMA may consider the
solvency of the alleged responsible party and how that
may affect recovery of funds. (GAO-24-106558)
FEMA could also recover funds from entities who received
Stafford Act assistance in certain cases. FEMA reported to
CRS that in cases where there is a party liable for causing
disaster-related damages, the onus is on the entity or

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most