About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (February 5, 2024)

handle is hein.crs/goveofy0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





Congressional Research Service
Informing the Iegislative debate since 1914


0


                                                                                                  February 5, 2024

National Infrastructure Bank: Proposals in the 118th Congress


introauction
The term infrastructure generally refers to long-lived,
capital-intensive systems and facilities in the areas of
transportation, energy, water, and telecommunications.
Some  broader definitions also include facilities for
education, recreation, and health. Although the condition
and performance of these systems are generally thought to
be important for the nation's well-being, there is less
agreement on the optimal level of infrastructure investment,
how  to maximize the effectiveness of spending, and the
appropriate role of the federal government.

State and local governments and the private sector provide
the bulk of infrastructure investment. The federal role in
infrastructure investment is important but limited in size
and scope. For example, the federal government was
responsible for 21% of total government highway outlays in
2021. The federal government supports infrastructure
investment in four ways: (1) direct investment in federally
owned  infrastructure; (2) grants to nonfederal entities,
especially state and local governments; (3) tax preferences
that forgo federal revenue to provide incentives for
nonfederal investment in infrastructure; and (4) loans and
other types of credit assistance to nonfederal entities.

National  Infrastructure  Bank
A national infrastructure bank is typically seen as a way for
the federal government to provide loans, loan guarantees,
and lines of credit to support infrastructure projects carried
out by nonfederal entities. Many different formulations
have been proposed over the years, but policy choices
typically include the following:

Infrastructure type. Some proposals focus on one type,
such as transportation or energy, but most would support a
wider spectrum of sectors.

Institutional form and governance. Most current
proposals would create a wholly owned government
corporation overseen by a board whose members are
selected by the President or Congress. Other models include
placing the bank inside an existing federal agency and
creating a government-sponsored enterprise with an
independent board.

Funding  source. Under the Federal Credit Reform Act of
1990 (FCRA;  2 U.S.C. §661(a)), credit assistance by the
bank would be supported by an appropriation that pays the
subsidy cost and federal administrative cost. According to
FCRA,  the subsidy cost is the estimated long-term cost to
the government of a direct loan or a loan guarantee ...
calculated on a net present value basis. An appropriation
would leverage larger loan amounts from the U.S. Treasury.


Assuming  a 10% subsidy cost, every $1 appropriated for
purposes other than administrative costs would enable the
bank to lend $10 to projects. Loan repayments would go to
the Treasury, not the bank. Alternatively, a bank could
operate as a revolving fund, such that credit assistance and
administrative costs are limited to the size of the
appropriation or other funds, but borrower repayments
could be used to make new loans. In some formulations, an
infrastructure bank would raise its own capital through
bond issuance or other borrowing.

Advantages   and  Dsadvantages
Advantages of a national infrastructure bank potentially
include the leveraging of state, local, and private-sector
investment, data-driven project selection, and a highly
skilled staff with expertise in infrastructure financing.
Drawbacks  might include the limited number of suitable
projects for support, the duplication of existing programs,
and pressure to allocate loans according to political criteria.
A bank may  also not be the lowest-cost means of increasing
infrastructure spending. The Congressional Budget Office
notes that a special entity issuing its own debt would not be
able to offer the low interest and issuance costs of the U.S.
Treasury. Some see a larger federal role in infrastructure as
a drawback and suggest that Congress might enhance the
operation of state infrastructure banks as an alternative.

Legislative Proposals  in the I I 8 Congress
Legislative proposals for a national infrastructure bank date
back to at least 1983 (S. 532, 98th Congress), and many bills
have been introduced since then. No proposal has been
enacted on its own or as part of broader legislation, such as
the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (P.L. 117-58).
National infrastructure bank bills introduced in the 118t
Congress include the Federal Infrastructure Bank Act of
2023 (H.R. 490); the National Infrastructure Investment
Corporation Act of 2023 (H.R. 3360); and the National
Infrastructure Bank Act of 2023 (H.R. 4052). Details of
these three bills can be seen in Table 1.

The National Infrastructure Investment Corporation Act of
2023, for example, would create the National Infrastructure
Investment Corporation, a wholly owned government
corporation, governed by a seven-member board of
directors. Three of these directors would be appointed by
the President with advice and consent of the Senate, and
four would be appointed by congressional leaders. The
corporation would be authorized to provide loans and loan
guarantees to sponsors of infrastructure, including the
transportation, energy, environmental, and
telecommunications sectors. The bill does not authorize an
appropriation. Instead, the corporation would be authorized
to accept loans from pension funds.

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most