About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (September 26, 2023)

handle is hein.crs/govemym0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 





Congressional Research &e
Informing the Iegislative debate since 191


September 26, 2023


Private Funding for Election Administration


State and local election offices sometimes receive private
donations of money, goods, or services to help them carry
out their work. Following the onset of the Coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19)   pandemic in the 2020 election
cycle, private individuals funded grant programs for state
and local election administration that were particularly
notable in their scale and sources. Those grant programs-
and the role of private funding in election administration in
general-have  been subjects of congressional interest in
subsequent Congresses, including in hearings and
legislation in the 118th Congress.
This In Focus offers an overview of private funding for
election administration. It starts by providing some
background  on funding for election administration in
general and the role of private funding in the 2020 election
cycle. It then describes some proposals from Members of
Congress and federal agency officials for responding to
private involvement in funding elections.

Funding for Election Adrministration
The federal government has provided some grant funding
and agency support for election administration (for more on
federal elections grant programs, see CRS Report R46646,
Election Administration: Federal Grant Funding for States
and Localities, by Karen L. Shanton). However, there is no
ongoing federal mechanism for funding the general
expenses of administering elections. Those costs are
covered, instead, by states and localities.
Exactly how financial responsibility for election
administration is distributed between the state and local
levels varies by state. Some states perform and fund most
election administration duties at the state level. A more
common   arrangement is for localities to cover most of the
costs, with support from the state for certain types of
elections or expenses. For example, some states share the
costs of elections when state-level candidates are on the
ballot, and most provide for the statewide voter registration
databases required by the Help America Vote Act (HAVA).

Private Funding in the 2020 Elections
The emergence  of the COVID-19  pandemic in the 2020
election cycle led many states and localities to change the
way  they ran their elections that year. Concerns about the
health risks posed by close contact prompted changes to in-
person voting, such as distributing personal protective
equipment (PPE)  to voters or election workers, increasing
access to curbside voting, and relocating polling places.
Health and safety concerns also led many states to expand
mail voting for 2020. Some states that required an excuse to
vote by mail suspended the excuse requirement for some or
all voters for the 2020 elections, for example, and some
states extended their deadlines for requesting a mail ballot.


The changes states and localities made to their election
processes in 2020-along  with other effects of the
pandemic, such as increased difficulty recruiting election
workers and obtaining paper for ballots-introduced new
costs. For example, many jurisdictions had to invest in
supplemental pay for election workers or in new workers or
equipment  to process a higher volume of mail ballots.
The federal government provided some funding to help
cover the additional costs. Congress included $400 million
in HAVA   funding in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic  Security (CARES)  Act (P.L. 116-136)
specifically to help states address the effects of the
pandemic  on the 2020 elections. Other HAVA grant
funding, including funds provided for FY2018 (P.L. 115-
141) and FY2020  (P.L. 116-93), could also be applied to
COVID-related  costs.
However,  some states and localities reported that the
federal contributions did not address all of their new needs.
Private businesses donated goods and services to help meet
some  of those needs. For example, professional sports
teams in some cities made their stadiums available to serve
as vote centers, and various companies gave PPE.
Some  private individuals also donated funding for grants to
state and local election offices. According to media reports,
some  particularly prominent sources of private funds
included the following:

*  Priscilla Chan and Mark   Zuckerberg. Chan  and
   Zuckerberg reported committing up to $419.5 million in
   the 2020 election cycle for grants to be distributed by
   two nonprofit organizations: the Center for Tech and
   Civic Life (CTCL, $350 million) and the Center for
   Election Innovation & Research (CEIR, $69.5 million).
   According  to grant documents and other reporting, the
   CTCL   funding was broadly available for ensuring safe
   and secure election administration and the CEIR grants
   were for voter education. The organizations reported
   making  the funding available to all election offices
   responsible for administering election activities and to
   all 50 states and the District of Columbia, respectively,
   and, with the exception of one state that withdrew its
   application, funding all of the requests they received.

*  Arnold  Schwarzenegger.  Schwarzenegger  donated
   $2.5 million to be distributed by the Schwarzenegger
   Institute for State and Global Policy at the University of
   Southern California. The institute reported that the
   funding was for supporting access to voting in states that
   had historically been required to submit changes to their
   election laws for federal preclearance under the Voting
   Rights Act and that it awarded grants to all eligible
   applicants (for more on preclearance, see CRS Report


te

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most