About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 [1] (December 1, 2022)

handle is hein.crs/govejpa0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Congressional Rai
informing the legislitive delI

earch Service
ito since 1914

Updated December 1, 2022

Changes to India's Citizenship Laws

In December 2019, India's Parliament passed, and its
President signed into law, the Citizenship Amendment Act
(CAA), 2019, altering the country's 1955 Citizenship Act.
For the first time in independent India's history, a religious
criterion was added to the country's naturalization process.
The changes sparked significant controversy, including
large-scale and sometimes violent protests. Opponents of
the CAA warn that Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his
Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) are pursuing
a Hindu majoritarian, anti-Muslim agenda that threatens
India's status as an officially secular republic and violates
international human rights norms and obligations. In
tandem with a National Register of Citizens (NRC) planned
by the federal government, the as-yet unimplemented CAA
may threaten the citizenship rights of India's large Muslim
minority of roughly 200 million. India's Supreme Court is
set to resume its review more than 250 petitions on the
law's constitutionality in December 2022.
Context: India's Hindu Natonalist Government
India's population of nearly 1.4 billion includes a Hindu
majority of about 80%, as well as a large Muslim minority
of above 14% (see Figure 1). Prime Minister Modi, a self-
avowed Hindu nationalist, took office in 2014 after his BJP
won the first outright majority in 30 years in the Lok Sabha
(the lower chamber of India's bicameral legislature). That
majority was expanded in May 2019 elections, providing an
apparent mandate for pursuing Hindu nationalist policy
goals. Among these were abrogation of Article 370 of the
Constitution, which provided special status to Jammu and
Kashmir, previously India's only Muslim-majority state
(announced in August 2019 and accomplished in October),
and construction of a Hindu temple at the Ayodhya site of a
historic mosque destroyed in 1992 (enabled by a long-
awaited September 2019 Supreme Court ruling).
Figure I. Religious Demographics in India, 2011

Source: Census of India, 201-.
Hindu nationalists tend to view India's history as a series of
humiliations at the hands of foreign invaders-Mughal
Muslims and later British colonialists. As a consequence,
they have rejected the secularism propounded by founders
of the modern Indian state such as Jawaharlal Nehru and
Mohandas Gandhi. Some analysts have contended that in
2019 and throughout the economic slowdown associated

with the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic,
the Modi-BJP government has responded to slowed growth
by becoming more reliant on emotive, religious-based
issues to consolidate political support.
The Citizenship Amendment Act, 2019
India's Citizenship Act of 1955 prohibited illegal
immigrants from becoming citizens. Among numerous
amendments to the act since 1955, none contained a
religious aspect. In 2015 and 2016, the Modi-BJP
government issued notifications that Hindus, Sikhs, Jains,
Buddhists, Parsis (Zoroastrians), and Christians-but not
Muslims-who came to India from Pakistan, Bangladesh,
or Afghanistan before 2015 would be exempted from laws
prohibiting citizenship for illegal immigrants. A Citizenship
Amendment Bill, meant to formalize these exemptions, was
introduced in 2016, and was first voted upon in early 2019,
when it was passed by the Lok Sabha. The bill was not
taken up by the Rajya Sabha (Parliament's upper chamber)
following resistance from opposition parties and street
protests in India's northeastern states.
In December 2019, seven months after a sweeping
reelection that expanded the BJP's Lok Sabha majority and
improved its standing in the Rajya Sabha, the bill was
passed by both chambers. Its key provisions-allowing
immigrants of six religions from three countries a path to
citizenship while excluding Muslims-may violate certain
Articles of the Indian Constitution (see text box). The CAA
was immediately challenged in the Supreme Court by
scores of petitioners.
Selected Articles of the Indian Constitution
14. The State shall not deny to any person equality before the
law or the equal protection of the laws within the
territory of India.
15. The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on
grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth,
or any of them.
India's federal government, which calls the CAA a benign
piece of legislation, argues that the three specified
countries have a state religion (Islam), resulting in the
persecution of religious minorities. Proponents say that
Muslims do not face persecution in Pakistan, Bangladesh,
or Afghanistan, and that the CAA is constitutional because
it addresses migrants rather than Indian citizens. Yet it is
not clear why migrants from other neighboring countries
with state (or favored) religions, such as Sri Lanka (where
Buddhism is the official religion and Tamil Hindus face
persecution) and Burma (where Buddhism enjoys primacy
and Rohingya Muslims are persecuted), are excluded from
a path to citizenship. In addition, oppressed Muslim
minority communities such as Pakistan's Shias and
Ahmadis enjoy no protections under the CAA.

Hindu 79.8%
Muslim 14.2%
Christian 2.3%
Buddhist,Jain,
and Others 2.0%
Sikh .7%

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most