About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (December 17, 2021)

handle is hein.crs/govegqc0001 and id is 1 raw text is: Starting a Federal Regional Commission or Authority

The federalregionalcommissions and authorities are seven
congressionally -chartered, federal-state partnerships that
were developed to address economic distress in targeted
geographic regions. With congressional authorization, new
regional commis sions couldbe created in areas of the
country not currently serviced. This In Focus addresses past
and anticipated future congressionalinterest into the is sues
and processes involved in starting a federalregional
commission based on existing models.
Current Corm        ssions and Authorities
As ofDecember 2019, seven federalregional commis sions
have been authorized by Congress. (Although some are
designated as authorities, this In Focus will referto all of
themcollectively as commis sions.) Four are currently
active: the Appalachian Regional Commis s ion (ARC); the
Delta RegionalAuthority (DRA); the Denali Commis sion;
and the Northern Border Regional Commission (NBRC).
Two were authorized but are inactive: the Northern Great
Plains Regional Authority (NGPRA) and the Southwest
Border Regional Commission (SBRC). In December2021,
the U.S. Senate confirmed the first federal co -chair for the
Southeast Crescent Regional Commission (SCRC) but it
has yet to convene its members or undertake core planning
or investment activities. The active commis sions engage in
economic development activities in their service areas with
funding fromannual congressional appropriations.
Structural Features
Common Structures
While the authorized federalregionalcommis sions have
individual distinguishing features, they all include a
structure broadly modeled after the Appalachian Regional
Commis sion, which was establishedby Congress in 1965
(40 U.S.C. § § 14101-14704). The commission structure is
comprised of a federalco-chair and the state governors of
member states or their designated representative (of which
one serves as state co-chair). The commission is
supplemented by professionalstaff to carry out
organizational activities. While largely considered
independent federal agencies, most commission members
and staff are not federal employees. The main exception is
the federal co-chair, thatco-chair's alternate, and that co-
chair's direct staff. However, a commission may adopt
certain federalpers onnel practices. Forexample, the ARC
pegs its salary grades to the Office of Personnel
Management's General Schedule, and former federal
employees may remain in the federalretirement system.
A new federalregional commission may use a similar
structure to the oneestablishedforthe ARC, which was
broadly replicated in the other commis sions. However, this

basic structure has been adapted to the circumstances and
needs of the region in question.
Structural Exceptions
While the prevailing structure is broadly apparent among
the federal regional commissions, exceptions and certain
novelties are also evident. For eiample, the ARC's
authorizing statute requires state governors to serve as ARC
members and has no allowance for governors to designate a
representative (although an alternatemay be allowed in
extenuating circumstances). By contrast, the other active
regional commis sions allow for the member state governois
to appointdesignatedrepresentatives to serve in their stead.
As a single-state commission, the DenaliCommission
features several structural exceptions. Alongside the federal
co-chair, the commissionis comprised of the state governor
(who is state co-chair) as well as five other members: the
University of Alaska president; the Alaska Municipal
League president; the Alaska Federationof Natives
president; the Alaska State AFL-ClOpresident; and the
Associated General Contractors of Alaskapresident. The
Denali Commis s ion's federal co -chair is appointed by the
Secretary of Commerce, while the federal co-chairs of other
commissions are appointedby the President andrequire
confirmation by the Senate. The Denali Commis sion's
inclusion of non-gubernatorial membership is also a feature
of the multi-state Northern Great Plains Regional Authoty.
Though inactive, the NGPRA consisted of the federalco-
chair, the state governors, as well as a Native American
tribal co-chair. The NGPRA also used a 501(c)(3)
organization as aresource for implementation.
A new federal regional commission may share the existing
commissions' basic structures while including features to
represent certain regional economic, social, cultural, or
historical characteristics. Suchan approachcould also be
adapted to programmatic intent; for example, emphases on
certain industries, types of economic development (such as
infrastructureorworkforce development), orotherpolicy
priorities, like energy transition or conservation.
Authoriation and Establishrent
Process
Regional Consensus and Demand
While chartered by Congress, federalregional commissions
are rooted in the s tates and localities they represent. Prior to
their statutory creation, all federalregionalcommissions
were preceded by state, local, and/or congressional
expres sions of support. The ARC, for example, was
foundedin response to initiatives fromAppalachian
regional governors. Those efforts led to presidential and
congressional legislation, which resulted in a study

Updated December 17,2021

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most