About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (February 10, 2021)

handle is hein.crs/govecdm0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 







              Congressional
           *Research Service
               informing he   gistive debate since 194




COVID-19 Vaccination Requirements:

Potential Constraints on Employer Mandates

Under Federal Law



February 10, 2021

The COVID-19  pandemic has forced unprecedented workplace changes and raised a host of legal issues.
Employers may struggle with how to protect workers from infection, avoid disruptions that may result
from sick leave and employee quarantines, and manage potential liability if an employee contracts the
virus at work. Some have noted employers' plans to encourage or require COVID-19 vaccinations for
workers as they become available. Policies will undoubtedly vary. Observers expect that health care,
travel, and retail businesses will more likely mandate or encourage vaccines, while those with less
customer interaction and more work-at-home capacity may defer to employee choice on whether to seek
vaccination. Some expect that smaller businesses, too, may be more likely to require vaccination, because
a wave of infection among a smaller staff could shut down operations. In accordance with guidance from
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), many health care providers already mandate
annual flu vaccination, providing an informative precedent for COVID-19 vaccination policies.
Whatever approach vaccination-policy decisionmakers consider, federal antidiscrimination statutes,
among other laws, may inform, and perhaps constrain, the implementation of vaccination mandates.
Federal civil rights laws do not bar vaccination mandates by private and state government employers, but
they may affect their scope. Some laws, for example, restrict employers from making certain medical
examinations or inquiries, while others require employers to consider workers' religious objections to
vaccination and potential disabilities preventing vaccination. The coronavirus pandemic is unique and,
thus far, courts have not evaluated vaccination requirements in this context. But the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which enforces these federal civil rights laws in employment, has
issued guidance on COVID-19 and vaccination policies. In addition, an underlying principle of many
employment antidiscrimination laws that call for accommodation is reasonableness. Concerns about
employees spreading COVID-19 will likely weigh heavily in any challenge to a vaccine mandate.
This Sidebar provides a general background, in light of recent EEOC guidance and courts' prior
adjudication of employer vaccine mandates, on federal antidiscrimination statutes (including the
Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) relevant to
employers or lawmakers crafting vaccination requirements. In addition, the Sidebar briefly considers

                                                               Congressional Research Service
                                                               https://crsreports.congress.gov
                                                                                   LSB10573

CRS Legal Sidebar
Prepared for Members and
Committees of Congress

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Contact us for annual subscription options:

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most