About | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline Law Journal Library | HeinOnline

1 1 (June 26, 2020)

handle is hein.crs/govdxyz0001 and id is 1 raw text is: 









                   Resarh $evice






Supreme Court Visits Appalachian Trail to

Address Pipeline Permitting Dispute



June  26,  2020

A proposed interstate natural gas pipeline in the mid-Atlantic is one step closer to reality after obtaining
one of the federal permits needed for construction and operation, thanks to a decision last week from the
U.S. Supreme Court. In U S. Forest Service v. Cotpastum River Piservation Association, the Court
tackled a complex web of federal legislation and regulations that ultimately boiled down to a simple
question: who has the authority to issue a permit for an infrastructure project to cross the Appalachian
National Scenic Trail (Appalachian Trail or Trail)? The Court found that the U.S. Forest Service (FS) had
acted properly when it issued a special use permit for the construction and operation of a subsurface
pipeline segment passing under the Trail. The Court reversed a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Fourth Circuit, which had held that the FS lacked statutory authority to issue the permit.
The decision involves the Atlantic Coast Pipeline-a proposed 604 mile natural gas pipeline that would
run from West Virginia though Virginia to Robeson County, NC, near the South Carolina border. The
developers obtained their Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity from the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (FERC)  in 2017 for the overall project. However, as is often the case, the
pipeline's developers also needed authorizations from other federal and state agencies for various
segments and characteristics of the project. Among these was permission to construct and operate a
segment of the pipeline that runs approximately 600 feet below the Appalachian Trail that is within the
George Washington National Forest. The litigation focused on how and fromwhomto obtain permission
for construction and operation of that segment of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project. In order to discern
the answer, the courts had to evaluate a morass of public land use statutes. The Fourth Circuit determined
that the Trail was part of the National Park System. As a result, the court held that the FS lacks authority
to grant the right-of-way because the relevant text of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (MLA) explicitly
excludes lands of the National Park System from the definition of federal lands through which FS
may grant a right-of-way.
The Supreme  Court disagreed, and reversed the lower court. In a 7-2 opinion authored by Justice Thomas,
the Court evaluated what it referred to as the interaction of multiple federal laws. The Court first
evaluated the Weeks Act of 1911, which provides for acquisition of lands to form the National Forest
System under the administration of FS pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Agriculture.
Exercising its Weeks Act authority, FS established the George Washington National Forest in 1932.
Congress later established the Appalachian Trail through the passage of the National Trails System Act
                                                                 Congressional ResearchService
                                                                 https://crsreports.congress.gov
                                                                                     LSB10503

CRS Lega Sidebar
Prepared for Membersand
C o m m i teeso f C o ng ress  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What Is HeinOnline?

HeinOnline is a subscription-based resource containing thousands of academic and legal journals from inception; complete coverage of government documents such as U.S. Statutes at Large, U.S. Code, Federal Register, Code of Federal Regulations, U.S. Reports, and much more. Documents are image-based, fully searchable PDFs with the authority of print combined with the accessibility of a user-friendly and powerful database. For more information, request a quote or trial for your organization below.



Short-term subscription options include 24 hours, 48 hours, or 1 week to HeinOnline.

Already a HeinOnline Subscriber?

profiles profiles most